Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31610777›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2019

Fast self-navigated wall shear stress measurements in the murine aortic arch using radial 4D-phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 17.6 T.

Patrick Winter, Kristina Andelovic, Thomas Kampf, Fabian Tobias Gutjahr, Julius Heidenreich, Alma Zernecke, Wolfgang Rudolf Bauer, Peter Michael Jakob, Volker Herold

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick WinterExperimental Physiks V, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany. patrick.winter@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1507-8524
Kristina AndelovicExperimental Physiks V, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany.
Thomas KampfExperimental Physiks V, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany.
Fabian Tobias GutjahrExperimental Physiks V, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany.
Julius HeidenreichMedical Clinic and Policlinic I, University Wuerzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Alma ZerneckeInstitute for Experimental Biomedicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 2, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Wolfgang Rudolf BauerMedical Clinic and Policlinic I, University Wuerzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Peter Michael JakobExperimental Physiks V, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany.
Volker HeroldExperimental Physiks V, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany.
University of Würzburg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and the assessment of wall shear stress (WSS) are non-invasive tools to study cardiovascular risks in vivo. Major limitations of conventional triggered methods are the long measurement times needed for high-resolution data sets and the necessity of stable electrocardiographic (ECG) triggering. In this work an ECG-free retrospectively synchronized method is presented that enables accelerated high-resolution measurements of 4D flow and WSS in the aortic arch of mice.

methods4D flow and WSS were measured in the aortic arch of 12-week-old wildtype C57BL/6 J mice (n = 7) with a radial 4D-phase-contrast (PC)-CMR sequence, which was validated in a flow phantom. Cardiac and respiratory motion signals were extracted from the radial CMR signal and were used for the reconstruction of 4D-flow data. Rigid motion correction and a first order B

resultsVolume flow, cross-sectional areas, WSS and the OSI were determined in a measurement time of only 32 min. Longitudinal and circumferential WSS and radial stress were assessed at 14 analysis planes along the aortic arch. The average longitudinal, circumferential and radial stress values were 1.52 ± 0.29 N/m

conclusionThis work presents a robust measurement of 4D flow and WSS in mice without the need of ECG trigger signals. The retrospective approach provides fast flow quantification within 35 min and a flexible reconstruction framework.

Indexed as

HemodynamicsMagnetic Resonance AngiographyAnimalsAorta, ThoracicBlood Flow VelocityFemaleMice, Inbred C57BLPerfusion ImagingPredictive Value of TestsRegional Blood FlowReproducibility of ResultsStress, MechanicalTime FactorsWorkflow4D flowAortic archMouseOSISelf-navigationWSS

Identifiers

PMID31610777
PMCPMC6792269
OpenAlexW2980397186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.