Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31610397›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis2020

Direct and indirect quantification of phosphate metabolites of nucleoside analogs in biological samples.

Nagsen Gautam, Jawaher Abdullah Alamoudi, Sushil Kumar, Yazen Alnouti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nagsen GautamDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Jawaher Abdullah AlamoudiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sushil KumarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Yazen AlnoutiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA. Electronic address: yalnouti@unmc.edu.

Funding

Pharmacokinetics and Drug-Drug InteractionsP01DA028555 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BOSKA, MICHAEL DOUGLAS · 2010 to 2019
$16.8M
NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA028555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are prodrugs that require intracellular phosphorylation to active triphosphate nucleotide metabolites (NMs) for their pharmacological activity. However, monitoring these pharmacologically active NMs is challenging due to their instability, high hydrophilicity, and their low concentrations in blood and tissues. Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is the gold standard technique for the quantification of NRTIs and their phosphorylated NMs. In this review, an overview of the publications describing the quantitative analysis of intracellular and total tissue concentration of NMs is presented. The focus of this review is the comparison of the different approaches and challenges associated with sample collection, tissue homogenization, cell lysis, cell counting, analyte extraction, sample storage conditions, and LC-MS analysis. Quantification methods of NMs via LC-MS can be categorized into direct and indirect methods. In the direct LC-MS methods, chromatographic retention of the NMs is accomplished by ion-exchange (IEX), ion-pairing (IP), hydrophilic interaction (HILIC), porous graphitic carbon (PGC) chromatography, or capillary electrophoresis (CE). In indirect methods, parent nucleosides are 1st generated from the dephosphorylation of NMs during sample preparation and are then quantified by reverse phase LC-MS as surrogates for their corresponding NMs. Both approaches have advantages and disadvantages associated with them, which are discussed in this review.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatography, LiquidHumansNucleosidesNucleotidesPhosphatesTandem Mass SpectrometryNucleosidesNucleotidesPhosphatesDirect quantificationIndirect quantificationLC–MS/MSNucleoside analogsNucleotide metabolites

Identifiers

PMID31610397
PMCPMC6931899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.