Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31610298›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

Deep neural networks and kernel regression achieve comparable accuracies for functional connectivity prediction of behavior and demographics.

Tong He, Ru Kong, Avram J Holmes, Minh Nguyen, Mert R Sabuncu, Simon B Eickhoff, Danilo Bzdok, Jiashi Feng, B T Thomas Yeo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 129 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tong HeClinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Sleep and Cognition, N.1 Institute for Health and Memory Networks Program, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Ru KongClinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Sleep and Cognition, N.1 Institute for Health and Memory Networks Program, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Avram J HolmesDepartments of Psychology and Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Minh NguyenClinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Sleep and Cognition, N.1 Institute for Health and Memory Networks Program, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Mert R SabuncuSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Simon B EickhoffInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Danilo BzdokDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, RWTH Aachen University, Germany; JARA-BRAIN, Jülich-Aachen Research Alliance, Germany; Parietal Team, INRIA, Neurospin, Bat 145, CEA Saclay, 91191, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Jiashi FengDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
B T Thomas YeoClinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Sleep and Cognition, N.1 Institute for Health and Memory Networks Program, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; NUS Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: thomas.yeo@nus.edu.sg.

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
Project 4P41EB015896 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2018
$9.8M
A Storage Area Network for Structural and Functional Image AnalysisS10RR023401 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FISCHL, BRUCE · 2009 to 2009
$2.0M
SILICON GRAPHICS PRISM EXTREME 128P/1TBS10RR023043 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SORENSEN, ALMA GREGORY · 2006 to 2006
$1.5M
Computeserver Structural &Functional Image AnalysisS10RR019307 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FISCHL, BRUCE · 2004 to 2004
$496k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR019307NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR023043NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR023401NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015896NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is significant interest in the development and application of deep neural networks (DNNs) to neuroimaging data. A growing literature suggests that DNNs outperform their classical counterparts in a variety of neuroimaging applications, yet there are few direct comparisons of relative utility. Here, we compared the performance of three DNN architectures and a classical machine learning algorithm (kernel regression) in predicting individual phenotypes from whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) patterns. One of the DNNs was a generic fully-connected feedforward neural network, while the other two DNNs were recently published approaches specifically designed to exploit the structure of connectome data. By using a combined sample of almost 10,000 participants from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) and UK Biobank, we showed that the three DNNs and kernel regression achieved similar performance across a wide range of behavioral and demographic measures. Furthermore, the generic feedforward neural network exhibited similar performance to the two state-of-the-art connectome-specific DNNs. When predicting fluid intelligence in the UK Biobank, performance of all algorithms dramatically improved when sample size increased from 100 to 1000 subjects. Improvement was smaller, but still significant, when sample size increased from 1000 to 5000 subjects. Importantly, kernel regression was competitive across all sample sizes. Overall, our study suggests that kernel regression is as effective as DNNs for RSFC-based behavioral prediction, while incurring significantly lower computational costs. Therefore, kernel regression might serve as a useful baseline algorithm for future studies.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAdultAgedAge FactorsBiological Specimen BanksBrainConnectomeDatasets as TopicDeep LearningFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedIntelligenceMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleDeep learningFingerprintingGraph convolutional neural networkKernel ridge regressionResting-state fMRI

Identifiers

PMID31610298
PMCPMC6984975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.