Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31609992›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2019

Evaluation of linear and non-linear activation dynamics models for insect muscle.

Nalin Harischandra, Anthony J Clare, Jure Zakotnik, Laura M L Blackburn, Tom Matheson, Volker Dürr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Changing 3D heading direction in terrestrial locomotion: effectiveness of visual landmarks and the onset of turning in stick insects.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The self-oscillation paradox in the flight motor ofJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nalin HarischandraBiological Cybernetics, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9232-4672
Anthony J ClareUniversity of Leicester, Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Jure ZakotnikBiological Cybernetics, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Laura M L BlackburnDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Tom MathesonUniversity of Leicester, Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Volker DürrBiological Cybernetics, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9239-4964
Bielefeld University · DEUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H014047/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I019065/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In computational modelling of sensory-motor control, the dynamics of muscle contraction is an important determinant of movement timing and joint stiffness. This is particularly so in animals with many slow muscles, as is the case in insects-many of which are important models for sensory-motor control. A muscle model is generally used to transform motoneuronal input into muscle force. Although standard models exist for vertebrate muscle innervated by many motoneurons, there is no agreement on a parametric model for single motoneuron stimulation of invertebrate muscle. Although several different models have been proposed, they have never been evaluated using a common experimental data set. We evaluate five models for isometric force production of a well-studied model system: the locust hind leg tibial extensor muscle. The response of this muscle to motoneuron spikes is best modelled as a non-linear low-pass system. Linear first-order models can approximate isometric force time courses well at high spike rates, but they cannot account for appropriate force time courses at low spike rates. A linear third-order model performs better, but only non-linear models can account for frequency-dependent change of decay time and force potentiation at intermediate stimulus frequencies. Some of the differences among published models are due to differences among experimental data sets. We developed a comprehensive toolbox for modelling muscle activation dynamics, and optimised model parameters using one data set. The "Hatze-Zakotnik model" that emphasizes an accurate single-twitch time course and uses frequency-dependent modulation of the twitch for force potentiation performs best for the slow motoneuron. Frequency-dependent modulation of a single twitch works less well for the fast motoneuron. The non-linear "Wilson" model that optimises parameters to all data set parts simultaneously performs better here. Our open-access toolbox provides powerful tools for researchers to fit appropriate models to a range of insect muscles.

Indexed as

AnimalsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationElectric StimulationFemaleGrasshoppersHindlimbInsectaIsometric ContractionLinear ModelsMaleModels, BiologicalMolecular Dynamics SimulationMotor NeuronsMovementMuscle Contraction

Identifiers

PMID31609992
PMCPMC6812852
OpenAlexW2980176406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.