Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31609989›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2019

Risk of pneumonia among residents living near goat and poultry farms during 2014-2016.

Pim M Post, Lenny Hogerwerf, Anke Huss, Ronald Petie, Gert Jan Boender, Christos Baliatsas, Erik Lebret, Dick Heederik, Thomas J Hagenaars, C Joris IJzermans and 1 more

Abstract readHistorical ArticleMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Proximity to livestock farms and COVID-19 in the Netherlands, 2020-2021.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. No Influence of PreviousJournal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pim M PostNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5372-6647
Lenny HogerwerfNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Anke HussInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Ronald PetieWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
Gert Jan BoenderWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
Christos BaliatsasNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Erik LebretNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Dick HeederikInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Thomas J HagenaarsWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
C Joris IJzermansNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Lidwien A M SmitInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0292-0946

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Netherlands, an association was found between the prevalence of pneumonia and living near goat and poultry farms in 2007-2013. This association then led to regulatory decisions to restrict the building of new goat farms and to reduce emissions of poultry farms. Confirmation of these results, however, is required because the period of previous analyses overlapped a Q-fever epidemic in 2007-2010. To confirm the association, we performed a population-based study during 2014-2016 based on general practitioner (GP) data. Electronic medical records of 90,183 persons were used to analyze the association between pneumonia and the population living in the proximity (within 500-2000 m distance) of goat and poultry farms. Data were analyzed with three types of logistic regression (with and without GP practice as a random intercept and with stratified analyses per GP practice) and a kernel model to discern the influence of different statistical methods on the outcomes. In all regression analyses involving adults, a statistically significant association between pneumonia and residence within 500 meters of goat farms was found (odds ratio [OR] range over all analyses types: 1.33-1.60), with a decreasing OR for increasing distances. In kernel analyses (including all ages), a population-attributable risk between 6.0 and 7.8% was found for a distance of 2000 meters in 2014-2016. The associations were consistent across all years and robust for mutual adjustment for proximity to other animals and for several other sensitivity analyses. However, associations with proximity to poultry farms are not supported by the present study. As the causes of the elevated pneumonia incidence in persons living close to goat farms remain unknown, further research into potential mechanisms is required for adequate prevention.

Indexed as

FarmsGoatsPoultryResidence CharacteristicsAdultAnimal HusbandryAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHistory, 21st CenturyHumansMaleModels, StatisticalNetherlandsOccupational Exposure

Identifiers

PMID31609989
PMCPMC6791541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.