ArticleNursing research
Characteristics and Practices Within Research Partnerships for Health and Social Equity.
Article in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Tools for assessing health research partnership outcomes and impacts: a systematic review.Health research policy and systems · 2023Pooled it
- How are health research partnerships assessed? A systematic review of outcomes, impacts, terminology and the use of theories, models and frameworks.Health research policy and systems · 2022Pooled it
- The Fallacy of Community-Based Research.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- "A Better Me for My Children": A Call for Systemic Relational Family Work in Child and Youth Mental Health.Families in society : the journal of contemporary human services · 2025Article
- How and why funders support engaged research.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Developing the engage for equity institutional multi-sector survey: Assessing academic institutional culture and climate for community-based participatory research (CBPR).Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Advancing genomics to improve health equity.Nature genetics · 2024Review
- Community Partnership to Co-Develop an Intervention to Promote Equitable Uptake of the COVID-19 Vaccine Among Pediatric Populations.Delaware journal of public health · 2024Article
- The Spanish translation, adaptation, and validation of a Community-Engaged Research survey and a pragmatic short version: Encuesta Comunitaria and FUERTES.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- A scoping review of the globally available tools for assessing health research partnership outcomes and impacts.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Development and Validation of a Measure to Assess Readiness to Advance Health and Equity: The Assessment for Advancing Community Transformation (AACT).Evaluation & the health professions · 2023Article
- Article
- Characterizing Canadian funded partnered health research projects between 2011 and 2019: a retrospective analysis.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Exploring theoretical mechanisms of community-engaged research: a multilevel cross-sectional national study of structural and relational practices in community-academic partnerships.International journal for equity in health · 2022Article
- Scales of Practices and Outcomes for Community-Engaged Research.American journal of community psychology · 2021Article
- A Participatory, Mixed Methods Approach to Define and Measure Partnership Synergy in Long-standing Equity-focused CBPR Partnerships.American journal of community psychology · 2020Review
- Engage for Equity: Development of Community-Based Participatory Research Tools.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2020Article
- Engage for Equity: A Long-Term Study of Community-Based Participatory Research and Community-Engaged Research Practices and Outcomes.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2020Article
- What Makes a Successful Partnership? Lessons from a Multi-Agency Equity-Focused Maternal and Early Childhood Health Partnership in Victoria, Australia: A Case Study.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
- Reaching Across the Divide: Integrating Equitable Community-Based Qualitative Methods and Trusted Engagement Strategies Into Arizona's Statewide Maternal and Child Community Assessment.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs federal research funding focuses more on academic/community collaborations to address health inequities, it is important to understand characteristics of these partnerships and how they work to achieve health equity outcomes.
objectivesThis study built on previous National Institutes of Health-funded research to (a) describe partnership characteristics and processes of federally funded, community-based participatory research (CBPR) or community-engaged research projects; (b) explore characteristics of these projects by stage of funding; and (c) build on previous understanding of partnership promising practices.
methodsBetween fall 2016 and spring 2017, we completed a cross-sectional analysis and principal component analysis of online survey data from key informants of federally funded CBPR and community-engaged research projects. Respondents for 179 projects (53% response rate) described project characteristics (e.g., type of partner, stage of partnership, and population) and the use of promising practices (e.g., stewardship, advisory board roles, training topics) by stage of partnership.
resultsProjects involved community, healthcare, and government partners, with 49% of respondents reporting their project was in the early stage of funding. More projects focused on Black/African American populations, whereas principal investigators were mostly White. The more established a partnership (e.g., with multiple projects), the more likely it employed the promising practices of stewardship (i.e., community safeguards for approval), community advisory boards, and training on values and power.
conclusionsCommunity engagement is a developmental process with differences between early-stage and established CBPR partnerships. Engaging in active reflection and adopting promising partnering practices are important for CBPR partnerships working to improve health equity. The data provided in this study provide key indicators for reflection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.