Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31609882›Full record

Trial reportPlastic and reconstructive surgery2020

DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines: Results from Each of Two Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Studies (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2).

Jean D Carruthers, Steve Fagien, John H Joseph, Shannon D Humphrey, Brian S Biesman, Conor J Gallagher, Yan Liu, Roman G Rubio, SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2 Investigator Group, SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2 Investigator Group includes the following

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05158166 phase1 / phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

DaxibotulinumtoxinA Injection for Treatment of Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2023 to 2025Enrolled22ConditionsAdductor Spasmodic Dysphonia, Voice Disorders, Spasmodic DysphoniaArmsDaxibotulinumtoxinA
NCT06195241 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Safety and Efficacy of DaxibotulinumtoxinA-Lanm for Benign Essential Blepharospasm and Hemifacial Spasm

TypeinterventionalSponsorMontefiore Medical CenterRan2025 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsBenign Essential Blepharospasm, Hemifacial SpasmArmsDaxibotulinumtoxinA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Botulinum toxin type A for facial wrinkles.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Developing Botulinum Toxin Drugs: Unexpected Challenges.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jean D CarruthersFrom the Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia; private practice; Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills; and Revance Therapeutics, Inc.
Steve FagienFrom the Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia; private practice; Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills; and Revance Therapeutics, Inc.
John H JosephFrom the Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia; private practice; Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills; and Revance Therapeutics, Inc.
Shannon D HumphreyFrom the Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia; private practice; Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills; and Revance Therapeutics, Inc.
Brian S BiesmanFrom the Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia; private practice; Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills; and Revance Therapeutics, Inc.
Conor J GallagherFrom the Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia; private practice; Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills; and Revance Therapeutics, Inc.
Yan LiuFrom the Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia; private practice; Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills; and Revance Therapeutics, Inc.
Roman G RubioFrom the Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia; private practice; Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills; and Revance Therapeutics, Inc.
SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2 Investigator Group
SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2 Investigator Group includes the following

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection (DAXI) is a novel botulinum toxin type A formulation in clinical development. A phase 2 dose-ranging study identified an optimal dose and demonstrated efficacy with a median duration of 24 weeks.

methodsIn two phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2), subjects with moderate or severe glabellar lines at maximum frown were assigned randomly to receive placebo or 40 U of DAXI. Glabellar lines were evaluated at least every 4 weeks for at least 24 weeks until severity returned to baseline (≤36 weeks).

resultsOverall, 609 subjects were enrolled (DAXI, n = 405; placebo, n = 204). DAXI was significantly more effective than placebo in achieving the primary efficacy outcome (≥2-point improvement in glabellar line severity at maximum frown at week 4 according to both investigator and subject ratings): 73.6 percent versus 0.0 percent (SAKURA 1), and 74.0 percent versus 1.0 percent (SAKURA 2) (both p < 0.0001). Composite investigator and subject ratings of maximum frown after DAXI treatment showed that glabellar line severity of none or mild was maintained for a median of 24.0 weeks (SAKURA 1) and 23.9 weeks (SAKURA 2), and glabellar line severity did not return to baseline levels for a median of 27.7 and 26.0 weeks, respectively. DAXI was generally well tolerated, with the most common adverse events related to DAXI treatment being headache (SAKURA 1, 7.0 percent; SAKURA 2, 5.9 percent) and injection-site pain (5.0 percent and 2.4 percent, respectively).

conclusionsResults from both studies were highly consistent. DAXI may offer a prolonged duration of response (median, ≥24 weeks) and is generally well tolerated. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, I.

Indexed as

InjectionsAdultBotulinum Toxins, Type ADouble-Blind MethodFemaleForeheadHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuromuscular AgentsSkin AgingYoung AdultBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agents

Identifiers

PMID31609882
PMCPMC6940025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.