Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31609772›Full record

Trial reportCritical care medicine2019

Early Palliative Care Consultation in the Medical ICU: A Cluster Randomized Crossover Trial.

Jessica Ma, Stephen Chi, Benjamin Buettner, Katherine Pollard, Monica Muir, Charu Kolekar, Noor Al-Hammadi, Ling Chen, Marin Kollef, Maria Dans

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05575791 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Preoperative Acceptance of Proactive Palliative Care Intervention

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCharite University, Berlin, GermanyRan2022 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsCancer, Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Postoperative Complications
NCT06574672 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Impact of an Embedded Palliative Care and Hospice Practitioner in the Medical ICU

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2024 to 2027Enrolled2,600ConditionsCritical Illness, End of Life, Quality of LifeArmsEmbedded Hospice and Palliative Care Practitioner, Embedded Hospice and Palliative Care Practitioner (Group Effect), None (Historical)
NCT07069010 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Burnout Syndrome Among Healthcare Professionals in Intensive Care Units Within the EPIC (Enhancing Palliative Care in ICU) Research

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of AthensRan2025 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsBurnout Syndrome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [S1 guideline on sustainability in intensive care and emergency medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jessica MaDuke Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Duke University and Health System, Durham, NC.
Stephen ChiDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Benjamin BuettnerDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Katherine PollardDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Monica MuirDivision of Palliative Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Charu KolekarDivision of Palliative Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Noor Al-HammadiDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Ling ChenDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Marin KollefDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Maria DansDivision of Palliative Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the impact of early triggered palliative care consultation on the outcomes of high-risk ICU patients.

designSingle-center cluster randomized crossover trial.

settingTwo medical ICUs at Barnes Jewish Hospital. PATIENTS: Patients (n = 199) admitted to the medical ICUs from August 2017 to May 2018 with a positive palliative care screen indicating high risk for morbidity or mortality.

interventionsThe medical ICUs were randomized to intervention or usual care followed by washout and crossover, with independent assignment of patients to each ICU at admission. Intervention arm patients received a palliative care consultation from an interprofessional team led by board-certified palliative care providers within 48 hours of ICU admission. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsNinety-seven patients (48.7%) were assigned to the intervention and 102 (51.3%) to usual care. Transition to do-not-resuscitate/do-not-intubate occurred earlier and significantly more often in the intervention group than the control group (50.5% vs 23.4%; p < 0.0001). The intervention group had significantly more transfers to hospice care (18.6% vs 4.9%; p < 0.01) with fewer ventilator days (median 4 vs 6 d; p < 0.05), tracheostomies performed (1% vs 7.8%; p < 0.05), and postdischarge emergency department visits and/or readmissions (17.3% vs 38.9%; p < 0.01). Although total operating cost was not significantly different, medical ICU (p < 0.01) and pharmacy (p < 0.05) operating costs were significantly lower in the intervention group. There was no significant difference in ICU length of stay (median 5 vs 5.5 d), hospital length of stay (median 10 vs 11 d), in-hospital mortality (22.6% vs 29.4%), or 30-day mortality between groups (35.1% vs 36.3%) (p > 0.05).

conclusionsEarly triggered palliative care consultation was associated with greater transition to do-not-resuscitate/do-not-intubate and to hospice care, as well as decreased ICU and post-ICU healthcare resource utilization. Our study suggests that routine palliative care consultation may positively impact the care of high risk, critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Early Medical InterventionIntensive Care UnitsPalliative CareReferral and ConsultationAgedAged, 80 and overCritical IllnessCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31609772
PMCPMC6861688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.