ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2019
Psychophysiological Responses in People Living with Dementia after an Art Gallery Intervention: An Exploratory Study.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Virtual reality-based cognitive training in mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic review of the efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for improving quality of life of people with dementia.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2026Pooled it
- [Effects of museum-based community programs on people with dementia and their primary caregivers-An umbrella review].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2025Pooled it
- Art Therapy Alleviates the Levels of Depression and Blood Glucose in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Pooled it
- Activities outside of the care setting for people with dementia: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2020Pooled it
- Effects of an art-based intervention in older adults with dementia: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Viewing art as a pathway to psychological well-being and physical health.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2026Article
- Rethinking culture: a narrative review on the evolving role of museum and art gallery-based heritage activities and programmes on wellbeing.Perspectives in public health · 2025Review
- Measuring salivary cortisol in biobehavioral research: A systematic review and methodological considerations.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2025Review
- The Impact of Regular Physical Activity on the Mental Health and Well-Being of Dementia Patients in High-Income Countries-A Systematic Scoping Review.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Online gallery facilitated art activities for people with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: A narrative review.Dementia (London, England) · 2023Review
- Early Benefits with Potential Long-Term Risks of a Comprehensive Intervention on Serum Cortisol Levels and Cognitive Performance in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2023Article
- Examining the Flourishing Impacts of Repeated Visits to a Virtual Art Museum and the Role of Immersion.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Psychobiological Evaluation of Day Clinic Treatment for People Living With Dementia - Feasibility and Pilot Analyses.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Evidence for the effects of viewing visual artworks on stress outcomes: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Creative Art Therapy as a Non-Pharmacological Intervention for Dementia: A Systematic Review.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2021Article
- Benefits of Cultural Activities on People With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of existing public spaces by people living with dementia, such as museums and art galleries, are becoming popular due to their ability to facilitate programs which promote social engagement and inclusion. However, few studies have investigated physiological outcomes of art gallery-based programs. Using a quasi-experimental design, the present study aimed to investigate the levels of salivary biomarkers of cortisol and interleukin-6, quality of life (QoL), depressive symptoms, cognition, and wellbeing, after attending the National Gallery of Australia (NGA) Art and Dementia program. Twenty-eight people living with dementia, each supported by a carer or family member, were recruited for a six-week program and were followed up at twelve weeks. In total, 25 participants (17 female; mean age 84.6±7.27 years) completed the study, and 22 provided viable saliva samples. The waking to evening salivary cortisol ratio was higher post-intervention (p = 0.033), and returned to baseline levels at follow-up (p = 1.00), indicating a more dynamic salivary cortisol rhythm in response to the six-week program. Interleukin-6 levels remained unchanged (p = 0.664). No improvements in QoL (DEMQOL-Carer) were observed between baseline and post-intervention (p = 0.076). However, self-reported depressive symptoms decreased post-intervention compared with baseline (p = 0.015), and memory (immediate recall) (p = 0.009) and verbal fluency (p = 0.027) improved between the same timepoints. The NGA Art and Dementia program appears to have quantifiable benefits, including improved hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function, justifying a need for longer controlled trial inclusive of physiological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.