Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31609172›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2019

Understanding the factors influencing doctors' intentions to report patient safety concerns: a qualitative study.

Antonia Rich, Rowena Viney, Ann Griffin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Psychology of envy towards medical colleagues.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The hard task of doing what matters for patients.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Antonia RichResearch Department of Medical Education, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2PF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1548-6328
Rowena VineyResearch Department of Medical Education, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2PF, UK.
Ann GriffinResearch Department of Medical Education, UCL Medical School, London WC1E 6AU, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate doctors' intentions to raise a patient safety concern by applying the socio-psychological model 'Theory of Planned Behaviour'.

designQualitative semi-structured focus groups and interviews.

settingTraining venues across England (North West, South East and South West).

participantsSampling was purposeful to include doctors from differing backgrounds and grades.

main outcome measuresPerceptions of raising a patient safety concern.

resultsWhile raising a concern was considered an appropriate professional behaviour, there were multiple barriers to raising a concern, which could be explained by the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Negative attitudes operated due to a fear of the consequences, such as becoming professionally isolated. Disapproval for raising a concern was encountered at an interpersonal and organisational level. Organisational constraints of workload and culture significantly undermined the raising of a concern. Responses about concerns were often side-lined or not taken seriously, leading to demotivation to report. This was reinforced by high-profile cases in the media and the negative treatment of whistle-blowers. While regulator guidance acted as an enabler to justify raising a concern, doctors felt disempowered to raise a concern about people in positions of greater power, and ceased to report concerns due to a perceived lack of action about concerns raised previously.

conclusionsIntentions to raise a concern were complex and highly contextual. The Theory of Planned Behaviour is a useful model to aid understanding of the factors which influence the decision to raise a concern. Results point to implications for policymakers, including the need to publicise positive stories of whistle-blowers and providing greater support to doctors.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDecision MakingIntentionMedical ErrorsPatient SafetyPhysiciansRisk ManagementEnglandFearFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleOrganizational CulturePower, PsychologicalProfessionalismGuidelinesmedical error/patient safetypostgraduate medical educationprofessional conduct and regulationqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID31609172
PMCPMC6794670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.