Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31608553›Full record

ArticleEMBO reports2019

Preparing scientists for a visual future: Visualization is a powerful tool for research and communication but requires training and support.

Shraddha Nayak, Janet H Iwasa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EMBO reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Seeing things the same way: perspectives and lessons learned from research-design collaborations.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  3. Student responses to creative coding in biomedical science education.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shraddha NayakDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Janet H IwasaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing complexity of biological data along with the need to communicate results requires visualization. It requires more training and support though to help scientists create efficient visual representations of their work.

Indexed as

CommunicationResearch PersonnelUser-Computer InterfaceHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalProtein ConformationResearch

Identifiers

PMID31608553
PMCPMC6831989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.