Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31608550›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging2020

Imaging Functional Recovery Following Ischemic Stroke: Clinical and Preclinical fMRI Studies.

Andrew Crofts, Michael E Kelly, Claire L Gibson

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on brain network connectivity and topology in post-stroke cognitive impairment patients: a resting-state fMRI study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Trial
  4. Improving physiological monitoring and reporting standards in preclinical stroke research.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. AlphaNeural regeneration research · 2023
    Article
  18. How to deal with mind-reading technologies.Frontiers in psychology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew CroftsDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Michael E KellyPreclinical Imaging Facility, Core Biotechnology Services, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Claire L GibsonSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3358-7341
University of Leicester · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N013913/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disability and effectiveness of physical therapy are highly variable following ischemic stroke due to different brain regions being affected. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of patients in the months and years following stroke have given some insight into how the brain recovers lost functions. Initially, new pathways are recruited to compensate for the lost region, showing as a brighter blood oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal over a larger area during a task than in healthy controls. Subsequently, activity is reduced to baseline levels as pathways become more efficient, mimicking the process of learning typically seen during development. Preclinical models of ischemic stroke aim to enhance understanding of the biology underlying recovery following stroke. However, the pattern of recruitment and focusing seen in humans has not been observed in preclinical fMRI studies that are highly variable methodologically. Resting-state fMRI studies show more consistency; however, there are still confounding factors to address. Anesthesia and method of stroke induction are the two main sources of variability in preclinical studies; improvements here can reduce variability and increase the intensity and reproducibility of the BOLD response detected by fMRI. Differences in task or stimulus and differences in analysis method also present a source of variability. This review compares clinical and preclinical fMRI studies of recovery following stroke and focuses on how refinement of preclinical models and MRI methods may obtain more representative fMRI data in relation to human studies.

Indexed as

BrainBrain IschemiaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRecovery of FunctionReproducibility of ResultsStrokeimagingplasticitypreclinicalrecoveryStroke

Identifiers

PMID31608550
PMCPMC7003729
OpenAlexW2979711240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.