Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31608427›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2020

Multivariate data analysis of capacitance frequency scanning for online monitoring of viable cell concentrations in small-scale bioreactors.

Sabrina Metze, Stefanie Blioch, Jens Matuszczyk, Gerhard Greller, Christian Grimm, Jochen Scholz, Marek Hoehse

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sabrina MetzeSartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, August-Spindler-Str. 11, 37079, Göttingen, Germany.
Stefanie BliochSartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, August-Spindler-Str. 11, 37079, Göttingen, Germany.
Jens MatuszczykSartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, August-Spindler-Str. 11, 37079, Göttingen, Germany.
Gerhard GrellerSartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, August-Spindler-Str. 11, 37079, Göttingen, Germany.
Christian GrimmSartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, August-Spindler-Str. 11, 37079, Göttingen, Germany.
Jochen ScholzSartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, August-Spindler-Str. 11, 37079, Göttingen, Germany.
Marek HoehseSartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, August-Spindler-Str. 11, 37079, Göttingen, Germany. Marek.Hoehse@sartorius.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viable cell concentration (VCC) is one of the most important process attributes during mammalian cell cultivations. Current state-of-the-art measurements of VCC comprise offline methods which do not allow for continuous process data. According to the FDA's process analytical technology initiative, process monitoring and control should be applied to gain process understanding and to ensure high product quality. In this work, the use of an inline capacitance probe to monitor online VCCs of a mammalian CHO cell culture process in small-scale bioreactors (250 mL) was investigated. Capacitance sensors using single frequency are increasingly common for biomass monitoring. However, the single-frequency signal corresponds to the cell polarization that represents the viable cell volume. Therefore single-frequency measurements are dependent on cell diameter changes. Measuring the capacitance across various frequencies (frequency scanning) can provide information about the VCC and cope with changing cell diameter. Applying multivariate data analysis on the frequency scanning data successfully enabled direct online monitoring of VCCs in this study. The multivariate model was trained with data from 5 standard cultivations. The model provided a prediction of VCCs with relative errors from 5.5 to 11%, which is a good agreement with the acceptance criterion based on the offline reference method accuracy (approximately 10% relative error) and strongly improved compared with single-frequency results (16 to 23% relative error). Furthermore, robustness trials were conducted to demonstrate the model's predictive ability under challenging conditions. The process deviations in regard to dilution steps and feed variations were detected immediately in the online prediction of the VCC with relative errors between 6.7 and 13.2%. Thus in summary, the presented method on capacitance frequency scanning demonstrates its suitability for process monitoring and control that can save batches, time, and cost. Graphical abstract.

Indexed as

Cell SurvivalAnimalsBiomassBioreactorsCell Culture TechniquesCHO CellsCricetulusElectric CapacitanceEquipment DesignMultivariate AnalysisCapacitance frequency scanningMammalian cell cultureMVDA (multifrequency permittivity, impedance spectroscopy, small-scale bioreactor, process monitoring and control)PAT

Identifiers

PMID31608427
PMCPMC8285309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.