Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31608425›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2020

Consequences of the new zolpidem prescription regulations: a cohort study from the French national healthcare database.

J Touchard, P Sabatier, G Airagnes, S Berdot, B Sabatier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Changes in Zolpidem Use Due to Media Broadcasts.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J TouchardPharmacy Department, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. justinetouchard@hotmail.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6573-8506
P SabatierEquipe 22, UMR 1138 INSERM, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France.
G AiragnesDepartment of Psychiatry and Addictology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
S BerdotPharmacy Department, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
B SabatierPharmacy Department, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRInserm · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine changes in the prevalence of zolpidem consumption since the change in the regulations of prescription. Formulations containing zolpidem were subject to the regulations of narcotics by the French decree of April 7, 2017.

methodsLongitudinal cohort study using data from the representative French healthcare database. The main outcome was the prevalence of oral hypnotic drug reimbursement before and after April 2017. The secondary outcome was the change in prescription habits for zolpidem since the decree in long-term users and excessive users.

resultsA total of 81,174 individuals had at least one hypnotic drug reimbursement; among, whom 2143 had at least one reimbursement of zolpidem. Before the decree, 26% had at least one reimbursement of zolpidem, whereas it dropped to 18.4% after the decree. Among the 545 long-term users, the reimbursement of zolpidem was discontinued after the decree for 60.4% and 24.2% retained zolpidem as a treatment. The main replacement drug was zopiclone for 6.4% of them. Among the 1598 excessive users, the reimbursement of zolpidem was stopped after the decree for 16.5% and 56.3% retained zolpidem as a treatment. The main replacement drug was zopiclone for 12.1% of them.

conclusionsThe French decree had a major impact on the reimbursement of oral zolpidem. Indeed, prescription of the hypnotic was discontinued for half of the long-term users of zolpidem, and just over one-sixth of the excessive users discontinued the prescription of zolpidem after the decree.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDrug PrescriptionsFemaleFranceHumansHypnotics and SedativesLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSleep Aids, PharmaceuticalZolpidemHypnotics and SedativesSleep Aids, PharmaceuticalZolpidemExcessive usersHealthcare databasePrescription regulationZolpidem

Identifiers

PMID31608425
OpenAlexW2979359681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.