Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31608331›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in dentistry

Evaluation of Antibacterial Effect of Propolis and its Application in Mouthwash Production.

Rahman Nazeri, Marzieh Ghaiour, Shima Abbasi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Clinical Evidence on the Use of Propolis for Oral Mucositis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Dental research journal · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Photodynamic Therapy With Propolis: Antibacterial Effects onJournal of lasers in medical sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rahman NazeriFaculty of Dentistry, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Marzieh GhaiourDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry and Research Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Shima AbbasiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Aja University of Medical Sciences · IRIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOur purpose was to determine the antibacterial properties of propolis and to evaluate its use as an antibacterial mouthwash with minimal complications. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this experimental laboratory study, an alcoholic propolis extract was prepared. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was calculated for four bacterial species including

resultsThe results of agar dilution by the number of colony-forming units showed the lowest MIC for

conclusionAccording to the results, propolis mouthwash was more efficient against the studied oral bacteria compared to CHX and Listerine.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsMouthwashesPropolis

Identifiers

PMID31608331
PMCPMC6778618
OpenAlexW2951399068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.