Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31608289›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2019

Modeling Electrostatic Force in Protein-Protein Recognition.

H B Mihiri Shashikala, Arghya Chakravorty, Emil Alexov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Juno and CD9 protein network organization in oolemma of mouse oocyte.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Measuring how two proteins affect each other's net charge in a crowded environment.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

H B Mihiri ShashikalaDepartment of Physics, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
Arghya ChakravortyDepartment of Physics, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
Emil AlexovDepartment of Physics, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.

Funding

New Generation DelPhi: large systems and beyond electrostaticsR01GM093937 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI ALEXOV, EMIL GEORGIEV · 2010 to 2023
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrostatic interactions are important for understanding molecular interactions, since they are long-range interactions and can guide binding partners to their correct binding positions. To investigate the role of electrostatic forces in molecular recognition, we calculated electrostatic forces between binding partners separated at various distances. The investigation was done on a large set of 275 protein complexes using recently developed DelPhiForce tool and in parallel, evaluating the total electrostatic force via electrostatic association energy. To accomplish the goal, we developed a method to find an appropriate direction to move one chain of protein complex away from its bound position and then calculate the corresponding electrostatic force as a function of separation distance. It is demonstrated that at large distances between the partners, the electrostatic force (magnitude and direction) is consistent among the protocols used and the main factors contributing to it are the net charge of the partners and their interfaces. However, at short distances, where partners form specific pair-wise interactions or de-solvation penalty becomes significant, the outcome depends on the precise balance of these factors. Based on the electrostatic force profile (force as a function of distance), we group the cases into four distinctive categories, among which the most intriguing is the case termed "soft landing." In this case, the electrostatic force at large distances is favorable assisting the partners to come together, while at short distance it opposes binding, and thus slows down the approach of the partners toward their physical binding.

Indexed as

bindingelectrostatic forceelectrostaticsmolecular recognitionpolar solvation energy

Identifiers

PMID31608289
PMCPMC6774301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.