ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2019
Modeling Electrostatic Force in Protein-Protein Recognition.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanistic design of cell-penetrating disruptors for phospho-dependent TACC3-CHC interaction.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2026Article
- Compact Assessment of Molecular Surface Complementarities Enhances Neural Network-Aided Prediction of Key Binding Residues.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Polymers for Disrupting Protein-Protein Interactions: Where Are We and Where Should We Be?Biomacromolecules · 2024Review
- Bacteria employ lysine acetylation of transcriptional regulators to adapt gene expression to cellular metabolism.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Polarized benzene rings can promote the interaction between CaM and the CaMBD region of nNOS.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024Article
- Electrostatic complementarity at the interface drives transient protein-protein interactions.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- In Silico Analyses of a Promising Drug Candidate for the Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Targeting Superoxide Dismutase I Protein.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Juno and CD9 protein network organization in oolemma of mouse oocyte.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Electrostatics in Computational Biophysics and Its Implications for Disease Effects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Antigenic evolution of human influenza H3N2 neuraminidase is constrained by charge balancing.eLife · 2021Article
- Measuring how two proteins affect each other's net charge in a crowded environment.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021Article
- Functional significance of germline EPAS1 variants.Endocrine-related cancer · 2021Article
- Molecular Characterisation of Soybean Osmotins and Their Involvement in Drought Stress Response.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- The Molecular Simulation Study of nNOS Activation Induced by the Interaction Between Its Calmodulin-Binding Domain and SUMO1.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrostatic interactions are important for understanding molecular interactions, since they are long-range interactions and can guide binding partners to their correct binding positions. To investigate the role of electrostatic forces in molecular recognition, we calculated electrostatic forces between binding partners separated at various distances. The investigation was done on a large set of 275 protein complexes using recently developed DelPhiForce tool and in parallel, evaluating the total electrostatic force via electrostatic association energy. To accomplish the goal, we developed a method to find an appropriate direction to move one chain of protein complex away from its bound position and then calculate the corresponding electrostatic force as a function of separation distance. It is demonstrated that at large distances between the partners, the electrostatic force (magnitude and direction) is consistent among the protocols used and the main factors contributing to it are the net charge of the partners and their interfaces. However, at short distances, where partners form specific pair-wise interactions or de-solvation penalty becomes significant, the outcome depends on the precise balance of these factors. Based on the electrostatic force profile (force as a function of distance), we group the cases into four distinctive categories, among which the most intriguing is the case termed "soft landing." In this case, the electrostatic force at large distances is favorable assisting the partners to come together, while at short distance it opposes binding, and thus slows down the approach of the partners toward their physical binding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.