ArticlePeerJ2019
MicroRNA-205-5p inhibits three-dimensional spheroid proliferation of ErbB2-overexpressing breast epithelial cells through direct targeting of CLCN3.
Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regulatory interplay of cyclin D1 and INSM1 in suppressing INSL6 expression: Implications for breast cancer biology.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
- miR-205-5p inhibits homocysteine-induced pulmonary microvascular endothelium dysfunction by targeting FOXO1.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2023Article
- miR-205 in Breast Cancer: State of the Art.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Flaming the fight against cancer cells: the role of microRNA-93.Cancer cell international · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We previously reported that microRNA-205-5p (miR-205-5p) is significantly decreased in the ErbB2-overexpressing breast epithelial cell line MCF10A-ErbB2 compared with control cells. In this study, we identified a direct target of miR-205-5p, chloride voltage-gated channel 3 (CLCN3). CLCN3 expression was induced by ErbB2 overexpression; this induced expression was then reduced to control levels by the transfection of the miR-205-5p precursor. In RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation with Ago1/2/3 antibody, CLCN3 was significantly enriched in 293T embryonic kidney cells with miR-205-5p mimic transfection compared with negative control mimic transfection. In luciferase reporter assays using CLCN3 3'-UTR constructs, the miR-205-5p mimic significantly decreased reporter activity of both wild-type and partial mutant constructs in MCF10A-ErbB2 cells. In contrast, no inhibitory effects of the miR-205-5p mimic were detected using the complete mutant constructs. Since miR-205-5p expression in exosomes derived from MCF10A-neo cells was substantially higher than in exosomes derived from MCF10A-ErbB2 cells, we next investigated whether an exosome-mediated miR-205-5p transfer could control CLCN3 expression. To this end, exosomal miR-205-5p derived from MCF10A-neo cells was functionally transferred to MCF10A-ErbB2 cells, which served to decrease the expression of CLCN3. To assess the roles of CLCN3 in breast cancer, we next performed three-dimensional (3D) spheroid proliferation analyses using MCF10A-ErbB2 cells treated with MCF10A-neo-derived exosomes or CLCN3 shRNA stably expressing SKBR3 and MDA-MB-453 breast cancer cells. Our results showed that both treatment with MCF10A-neo-derived exosome and CLCN3 shRNA expression suppressed 3D spheroid proliferation. Collectively, these novel findings suggest that CLCN3 may be a novel direct target of miR-205-5p and this CLCN3/miR-205-5p interaction may serve a pivotal role in regulating breast cancer cellular proliferation under physiological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.