ArticleFrontiers in physiology2019
Identifying Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Using Rest and Exercise Seismocardiography.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06880133 (Evaluation and Improvement of Diagnostic Accuracy of Seismocardiography and Gyrocardiography for Non-Invasive Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis in Comparison With Coronary Artery Calcium Computed Tomography, Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, and Invasive Coronary Angiography), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation and Improvement of Diagnostic Accuracy of Seismocardiography and Gyrocardiography for Non-Invasive Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis in Comparison With Coronary Artery Calcium Computed Tomography, Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, and Invasive Coronary Angiography
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electro-mechanical risk score for coronary artery disease risk estimation using seismocardiography.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Automated Detection of Carotid Artery Stenosis Using a Sensitive Accelerometer Wearable Sensor and Interpretable Machine Learning.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Multi-site cardiac rhythm monitoring via multi-channel SCG system and exercise-induced physiological analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Effect of respiration and exercise on seismocardiographic signals.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Body Acoustics for the Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Medical Conditions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Chest-Worn Inertial Sensors: A Survey of Applications and Methods.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Detecting Coronary Artery Disease Using Rest Seismocardiography and Gyrocardiography.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of death globally. Patients with suspected CAD are usually assessed by exercise electrocardiography (ECG). Subsequent tests, such as coronary angiography and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) are performed to localize the stenosis and to estimate the degree of blockage. The present study describes a non-invasive methodology to identify patients with CAD based on the analysis of both rest and exercise seismocardiography (SCG). SCG is a non-invasive technology for capturing the acceleration of the chest induced by myocardial motion and vibrations. SCG signals were recorded from 185 individuals at rest and immediately after exercise. Two models were developed using the characterization of the rest and exercise SCG signals to identify individuals with CAD. The models were validated against related results from angiography. For the rest model, accuracy was 74%, and sensitivity and specificity were estimated as 75 and 72%, respectively. For the exercise model accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 81, 82, and 84%, respectively. The rest and exercise models presented a bootstrap-corrected area under the curve of 0.77 and 0.91, respectively. The discrimination slope was estimated 0.32 for rest model and 0.47 for the exercise model. The difference between the discrimination slopes of these two models was 0.15 (95% CI: 0.10 to 0.23,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.