Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31607875›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2019

Auditory Mismatch Negativity Response in Institutionalized Children.

Irina Ovchinnikova, Marina A Zhukova, Anna Luchina, Maxim V Petrov, Marina J Vasilyeva, Elena L Grigorenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Irina OvchinnikovaLaboratory of Translational Sciences of Human Development, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Marina A ZhukovaLaboratory of Translational Sciences of Human Development, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Anna LuchinaLaboratory of Translational Sciences of Human Development, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Maxim V PetrovLaboratory of Translational Sciences of Human Development, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Marina J VasilyevaDepartment of Higher Nervous Activity and Psychophysiology, Biological Faculty, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Elena L GrigorenkoLaboratory of Translational Sciences of Human Development, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The attunement of speech perception/discrimination to the properties of one's native language is a crucial step in speech and language development at early ages. Studying these processes in young children with a history of institutionalization is of great interest, as being raised in institutional care (IC) may lead to lags in language development. The sample consisted of 82 children, split into two age groups. The younger age group (<12 months) included 17 children from the IC and 17 children from the biological-family-care (BFC) group. The older group (>12 months) consisted of 23 children from the IC group, and 25 children from the BFC group. A double-oddball paradigm with three consonant-vowel syllables was used, utilizing native (Russian) and foreign (Hindi) languages. A Mismatch Negativity (MMN) component was elicited within a 125-225 ms time window in the frontal-central electrode. Findings demonstrate the absence of MMN effect in the younger age group, regardless of the living environment. Children in the older group are sensitive to native deviants and do not differentiate foreign language contrasts. No significant differences were observed between the IC and BFC groups for children older than 12 months, indicating that children in the IC have typical phonological processing. The results show that the MMN effect is not registered in Russian speaking children before the age of 12 months, regardless of their living environment. At 20 months of age, institutionally reared children show no evidence of delays in phonetic development despite a limited experience of language.

Indexed as

auditory discriminationevent-related potentialsinstitutionalizationlanguage developmentmismatch negativityMMNpsychosocial deprivation

Identifiers

PMID31607875
PMCPMC6774417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.