Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31607674›Full record

ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2021

Determinants of Intima-Media Thickness in the Young: The ALSPAC Study.

Scott T Chiesa, Marietta Charakida, Georgios Georgiopoulos, Frida Dangardt, Kaitlin H Wade, Alicja Rapala, Devina J Bhowruth, Helen C Nguyen, Vivek Muthurangu, Rukshana Shroff and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Hypertension and vascular health in the young.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Scott T ChiesaVascular Physiology Unit, UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, London, United Kingdom.
Marietta CharakidaVascular Physiology Unit, UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, London, United Kingdom; Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, United Kingdom.
Georgios Georgiopoulos1st Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Frida DangardtVascular Physiology Unit, UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, London, United Kingdom; Department of Paediatric Physiology, The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, The Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Kaitlin H WadeMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), The University of Bristol, United Kingdom; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Alicja RapalaVascular Physiology Unit, UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, London, United Kingdom; Department of Population Science and Experimental Medicine, UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, London, United Kingdom.
Devina J BhowruthVascular Physiology Unit, UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, London, United Kingdom.
Helen C NguyenVascular Physiology Unit, UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, London, United Kingdom.
Vivek MuthuranguCentre for Cardiovascular Imaging, UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, London, United Kingdom.
Rukshana ShroffVascular Physiology Unit, UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, London, United Kingdom; Nephrology Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
George Davey SmithMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), The University of Bristol, United Kingdom; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Debbie A LawlorMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), The University of Bristol, United Kingdom; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Naveed SattarInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Science, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Nicholas J TimpsonMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), The University of Bristol, United Kingdom; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Alun D HughesDepartment of Population Science and Experimental Medicine, UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, London, United Kingdom; MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, London, United Kingdom.
John E DeanfieldVascular Physiology Unit, UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: j.deanfield@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBKing's College London · GBMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing · GBNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation CS/15/6/31468British Heart Foundation PG/06/145British Heart Foundation RG/10/004/28240Medical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MC_PC_19009Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/6Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/3Wellcome Trust 086676/7/08/ZWellcome Trust 096989/Z11/ZWellcome Trust 102215/2/13/2Wellcome Trust 202802/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study characterized the determinants of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) in a large (n > 4,000) longitudinal cohort of healthy young people age 9 to 21 years.

backgroundGreater cIMT is commonly used in the young as a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis, but its evolution at this age is still poorly understood.

methodsAssociations between cardiovascular risk factors and cIMT were investigated in both longitudinal (ages 9 to 17 years) and cross-sectional (ages 17 and 21 years) analyses, with the latter also related to other measures of carotid structure and stress. Additional use of ultra-high frequency ultrasound in the radial artery at age 21 years allowed investigation of the distinct layers (i.e., intima or media) that may underlie observed differences.

resultsFat-free mass (FFM) and systolic blood pressure were the only modifiable risk factors positively associated with cIMT (e.g., mean difference in cIMT per 1-SD increase in FFM at age 17: 0.007 mm: 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.004 to 0.010; p < 0.001), whereas fat mass was negatively associated with cIMT (difference: -0.0032; 95% CI: 0.004 to -0.001; p = 0.001). Similar results were obtained when investigating cumulative exposure to these factors throughout adolescence. An increase in cIMT maintained circumferential wall stress in the face of increased mean arterial pressure when increases in body mass were attributable to increased FFM, but not fat mass. Risk factor-associated differences in the radial artery occurred in the media alone, and there was little evidence of a relationship between intimal thickness and any risk factor.

conclusionsSubtle changes in cIMT in the young may predominantly involve the media and represent physiological adaptations as opposed to subclinical atherosclerosis. Other vascular measures may be more appropriate for the identification of arterial disease before adulthood.

Indexed as

Carotid ArteriesCarotid Intima-Media ThicknessAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePredictive Value of TestsRisk FactorsYoung AdultALSPACfat-free massintima-media thicknesssystolic blood pressure

Identifiers

PMID31607674
PMCPMC7851110
OpenAlexW2979468556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.