Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31607403›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria

[Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli producers of community urinary tract infections in Galicia (Spain). Period: 2016-2017].

Isabel Losada, Gema Barbeito, Fernando García-Garrote, Begoña Fernández-Pérez, Alberto Malvar, Xurxo Hervada, Grupo de trabajo de la SOGAMIC para el estudio de las resistencias en Galicia, Grupo de trabajo de la SOGAMIC Sociedad Gallega de Microbiología para el estudio de las resistencias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. IJID regions · 2025
    Article
  2. Influence of a microbiological commentary on the management of asymptomatic bacteriuria.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Isabel LosadaDirección Xeral de Saúde Pública, Consellería de Sanidade, Xunta de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela, España. Electronic address: isabel.losada.castillo@sergas.es.
Gema BarbeitoComplexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, España.
Fernando García-GarroteHospital Universitario Lucus-Augusti de Lugo, Lugo, España.
Begoña Fernández-PérezComplexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, España.
Alberto MalvarDirección Xeral de Saúde Pública, Consellería de Sanidade, Xunta de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela, España.
Xurxo HervadaDirección Xeral de Saúde Pública, Consellería de Sanidade, Xunta de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela, España.
Grupo de trabajo de la SOGAMIC para el estudio de las resistencias en Galicia
Grupo de trabajo de la SOGAMIC Sociedad Gallega de Microbiología para el estudio de las resistencias

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEscherichia coli (E. coli) is responsible for the majority of community urinary tract infections. The objective of the study is to know the sensitivity spectrum of E. coli in urinary tract infections to be able to recommend the appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment.

designCross-sectional, multicentric, retrospective study. LOCATION: Galician 8 public hospitals, practically the entire population of Galicia (Spain).

participants43,137 outpatients with urinary tract infection due to E. coli isolated in urine in 2016/2017. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Analyzed variables: demographic, minimum inhibitory concentration and interpretation of sensitivity according to CLSI criteria and resistance mechanisms. The antibiotics studied were: ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, cefepime, gentamicin, nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, cotrimoxazole, imipenem and ertapenem. The identification and sensitivity were made mainly by automated methods.

resultsThe percentages of non-sensitivity of E. coli isolates were: ampicillin 49.2%, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid 17.8%, cefotaxime 6.7%, cefepime 5.7%, ertapenem 0.04%, imipenem 0.05%, gentamicin 9,1%, ciprofloxacin 26.2%, fosfomycin 3.3%, nitrofurantoin 2.4% and cotrimoxazole 23.9%. The non-sensitivities were higher in men and as age increases. Six percent of E. coli were producers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases.

conclusionsThe empirical treatment in Galicia for uncomplicated cystitis produced by E. coli in women continues to be nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin. In men under 15 years of age, fosfomycin is indicated and in men older than 15 years, treatment in our environment should include culture and administer a 3rd generation oral cephalosporin empirically. Cotrimoxazole and ciprofloxacin are not recommended as empirical treatment because of their high resistance rates.

Indexed as

Escherichia coli InfectionsUrinary Tract InfectionsAdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesEscherichia coliFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSpainAnti-Bacterial AgentsCommunity urinary tract infectionsE. coliEmpirical treatmentEstudio multicéntricoInfecciones del tracto urinario comunitariasMulticenter studyTratamiento empírico

Identifiers

PMID31607403
PMCPMC7393545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.