Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31607074›Full record

ArticleNeurospine2019

Posterior Surgical Techniques for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.

Abdul Hafid Bajamal, Se-Hoon Kim, Mohammad Reza Arifianto, Muhammad Faris, Eko Agus Subagio, Ben Roitberg, Inyang Udo-Inyang, Jonathan Belding, Mehmet Zileli, Jutty K B C Parthiban and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurospine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Rehabilitation strategies following posterior cervical decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a narrative review and framework for clinical practice.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Abdul Hafid BajamalDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dr. Soetomo Academic General Hospital, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Se-Hoon KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea.
Mohammad Reza ArifiantoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dr. Soetomo Academic General Hospital, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Muhammad FarisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dr. Soetomo Academic General Hospital, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Eko Agus SubagioDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dr. Soetomo Academic General Hospital, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Ben RoitbergDepartment of Neurosurgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Inyang Udo-InyangDepartment of Neurosurgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jonathan BeldingDepartment of Neurosurgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Mehmet ZileliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Jutty K B C ParthibanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, India.
World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) Spine Committee
Airlangga University · IDMetroHealth Medical Center · USEge University · TRKorea University · KRKovai Medical Center and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study was conducted to determine and recommend the most up-to-date information on the indications, complications, and outcomes of posterior surgical treatments for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) on the basis of a literature review.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was performed, using the MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases, for peer-reviewed articles published in English during the last 10 years.

resultsPosterior techniques, which include laminectomy alone, laminectomy with fusion, and laminoplasty, are often used in patients with involvement of 3 or more levels. Posterior decompression for CSM is effective for improving patients' neurological function. Complications resulting from posterior cervical spine surgery include injury to the spinal cord and nerve roots, complications related to posterior screw fixation or instrumentation, C5 palsy, spring-back closure of lamina, and postlaminectomy kyphosis.

conclusionIt is necessary to consider multiple factors when deciding on the appropriate operation for a particular patient. Surgeons need to tailor preoperative discussions to ensure that patients are aware of these facts. Further research is needed on the cost-to-benefit analysis of various surgical approaches, the comparative efficacy of surgical approaches using various techniques, and long-term outcomes, as current knowledge is deficient in this regard.

Indexed as

Cervical spondylosisComplicationsCompressive myelopathyLaminectomyLaminoplastyOutcomes assessment

Identifiers

PMID31607074
PMCPMC6790723
OpenAlexW2975325617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.