ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020
Unique biomechanical signatures of Bryan, Prodisc C, and Prestige LP cervical disc replacements: a finite element modelling study.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of 10-year follow-up result of hybrid surgery and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of contiguous three-level cervical degenerative disc diseases: risk factors for heterotopic ossification.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- A Review of Motion-Preserving Cervical Spinal Implants and Fusion Constructs.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Combined effect of artificial cervical disc replacement and facet tropism on the index-level facet joints: a finite element study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Comparison of Load-Sharing Responses Between Graded Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy and Conventional Fusion Using Finite Element Modeling.Journal of engineering and science in medical diagnostics and therapy · 2024Article
- Cervical Column and Cord and Column Responses in Whiplash With Stenosis: A Finite Element Modeling Study.Journal of engineering and science in medical diagnostics and therapy · 2024Article
- Does the novel artificial cervical joint complex resolve the conflict between stability and mobility after anterior cervical surgery? a finite element study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Biomechanical effects of endplate sagittal coverage change on cervical disc replacement: a finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Spinal Cord Stress After Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: Results from a Patient-Specific Finite Element Model.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Finite element analysis of optimized novel additively manufactured non-articulating prostheses for cervical total disc replacement.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Gender Differences in Cervical Spine Motions and Loads With Head Supported Mass Using Finite Element Models.Journal of engineering and science in medical diagnostics and therapy · 2022Article
- Effect of Facet Tropism on Postoperative Cervical Range of Motion After Single-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.Global spine journal · 2022Article
- Biomechanical behaviour of tension-band-reconstruction titanium plate in open-door laminoplasty: a study based on finite element analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Biomechanical Analysis of 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Under Physiologic Loads Using a Finite Element Model.Neurospine · 2022Article
- Comparison of the Safety of Outpatient Cervical Disc Replacement With Inpatient Cervical Disc Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Global spine journal · 2021Article
- A Comparison Study of Four Cervical Disk Arthroplasty Devices Using Finite Element Models.Asian spine journal · 2021Article
- Effect of heterotopic ossification after bryan-cervical disc arthroplasty on adjacent level range of motion: A finite element study.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021Article
- Biomechanical Analysis of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Using Cervical Subtotal Discectomy Prosthesis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- The MOVE-C Cervical Artificial Disc - Design, Materials, Mechanical Safety.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of the study is to examine the biomechanical alterations in the index and adjacent levels of the human cervical spine after cervical arthroplasty with Bryan, Prodisc C, or Prestige LP.
methodsA previously validated C2-T1 osteoligamentous finite element model was used to perform virtual C5-6 arthroplasty using three different FDA-approved artificial cervical discs. Motion-controlled moment loading protocol was used. Moment was varied until Bryan, Prodisc C, and Prestige LP models displayed the same total range of motion across C3-C7 as the intact spine model at 2 Nm of pure moment loading. Range of motion (ROM) and facet force (FF) were recorded at the index level. ROM, FF, and intradiscal pressure (IDP) were recorded at the adjacent levels.
resultsProdisc C and Prestige LP led to supraphysiologic ROM and FF at the index level while decreasing ROM and FF at the adjacent levels. In contrast, Bryan reduced ROM and FF at the index level. Bryan increased ROM and FF at the adjacent levels in flexion, but decreased ROM and FF in the adjacent levels in extension. Prodisc C decreased IDP at the adjacent levels. Bryan reduced IDP in extension only. Prestige LP increased adjacent-level IDP.
conclusionsThe distinct designs and material compositions of the three artificial discs result in varying biomechanical alterations at the index and adjacent levels in the cervical spine after implantation. The findings confirm the design and material influence on the spine biomechanics, as well as the advantages and contraindications of cervical arthroplasty in general. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.