Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31606815›Full record

Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020

The association of cervical sagittal alignment with adjacent segment degeneration.

Xiaoyu Yang, Ronald H M A Bartels, Roland Donk, Mark P Arts, Caroline M W Goedmakers, Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Correlation analysis between preoperative CZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. C4 constant vertebra: a novel benchmark of physiological cervical sagittal alignment.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  9. A novel classification that defines the normal cervical spine: an analysis based on 632 asymptomatic Chinese volunteers.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  10. Emerging Technologies within Spine Surgery.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Adjacent segment mobility after ACDF considering fusion status at the implant insertion site.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoyu YangJ11-R-83: Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. X.Yang@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-9055-1230
Ronald H M A BartelsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Roland DonkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Via Sana Clinics, Mill, The Netherlands.
Mark P ArtsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Caroline M W GoedmakersJ11-R-83: Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Carmen L A Vleggeert-LankampJ11-R-83: Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University · NLKliniek ViaSana · NLMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

China Scholarship Council 1200 euroLeids Universitair Medisch Centrum 700 euro
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCervical spine surgery may affect sagittal alignment parameters and induce accelerated degeneration of the cervical spine. Cervical sagittal alignment parameters of surgical patients will be correlated with radiological adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and with clinical outcome parameters.

methodsPatients were analysed from two randomized, double-blinded trials comparing anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA), with intervertebral cage (ACDF) and without intervertebral cage (ACD). C2-C7 lordosis, T1 slope, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and the occipito-cervical angle (OCI) were determined as cervical sagittal alignment parameters. Radiological ASD was scored by the combination of decrease in disc height and anterior osteophyte formation. Neck disability index (NDI), SF-36 PCS and MCS were evaluated as clinical outcomes.

resultsThe cervical sagittal alignment parameters were comparable between the three treatment groups, both at baseline and at 2-year follow-up. Irrespective of surgical method, C2-C7 lordosis was found to increase from 11° to 13°, but the other parameters remained stable during follow-up. Only the OCI was demonstrated to be associated with the presence and positive progression of radiological ASD, both at baseline and at 2-year follow-up. NDI, SF-36 PCS and MCS were demonstrated not to be correlated with cervical sagittal alignment. Likewise, a correlation with the value or change of the OCI was absent.

conclusionOCI, an important factor to maintain horizontal gaze, was demonstrated to be associated with radiological ASD, suggesting that the occipito-cervical angle influences accelerated cervical degeneration. Since OCI did not change after surgery, degeneration of the cervical spine may be predicted by the value of OCI. NECK TRIAL: Dutch Trial Register Number NTR1289. PROCON TRIAL: Trial Register Number ISRCTN41681847. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

NeckCervical VertebraeDiskectomyHumansLordosisRetrospective StudiesSpinal FusionAdjacent segment degenerationCervical lordosisCervical sagittal alignmentSagittal vertical axisT1 slope

Identifiers

PMID31606815
OpenAlexW2979998157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.