Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31606760›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2020

The age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index as a predictor of overall survival of surgically treated non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Ho Won Kang, Sung Min Kim, Won Tae Kim, Seok Joong Yun, Sang-Cheol Lee, Wun-Jae Kim, Eu Chang Hwang, Seok Ho Kang, Sung-Hoo Hong, Jinsoo Chung and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ho Won KangDepartment of Urology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, 1st Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju, Chungbuk, 28644, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8164-4427
Sung Min KimDepartment of Urology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, 1st Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju, Chungbuk, 28644, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2374-020X
Won Tae KimDepartment of Urology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, 1st Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju, Chungbuk, 28644, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7482-4550
Seok Joong YunDepartment of Urology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, 1st Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju, Chungbuk, 28644, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7737-4746
Sang-Cheol LeeDepartment of Urology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, 1st Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju, Chungbuk, 28644, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4163-2210
Wun-Jae KimDepartment of Urology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, 1st Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju, Chungbuk, 28644, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8060-8926
Eu Chang HwangDepartment of Urology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2031-124X
Seok Ho KangDepartment of Urology, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1524-5233
Sung-Hoo HongDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1952-4010
Jinsoo ChungDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2251-5331
Tae Gyun KwonDepartment of Urology, Kyungpook National University College of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4390-0952
Hyeon Hoe KimDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6600-4539
Cheol KwakDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1987-2111
Seok-Soo ByunDepartment of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166, Gumi-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Kyunggi-do, 463-707, South Korea. ssbyun@snubh.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9356-9500
Yong-June KimDepartment of Urology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, 1st Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju, Chungbuk, 28644, South Korea. urokyj@cbnu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7638-7174
KORCC (KOrean Renal Cell Carcinoma) Group

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2018R1D1A1B07043906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNo study has evaluated the prognostic impact of the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (AACI) in those with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study aimed to evaluate the utility of the AACI for predicting long-term survival in patients with surgically treated non-metastatic clear cell RCC (ccRCC).

methodsData from 698 patients with non-metastatic ccRCC who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy as primary therapy from a multi-institutional Korean collaboration between 1988 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinicopathological variables and survival outcomes of those with AACI scores ≤ 3 (n = 324), 4-5 (n = 292), and ≥ 6 (n = 82) were compared.

resultsPatients with a high AACI score were older and more likely to be female. They were also more likely to have diabetes or hypertension, a worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and lower preoperative hemoglobin, albumin, serum calcium, and serum total cholesterol levels. Regarding pathologic features, a high AACI score was associated with advanced stage. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that AACI ≥ 6 was associated with shorter cancer-specific (log-rank test, P < 0.001) and overall survival (log-rank test, P < 0.001), but not with recurrence-free survival (log-rank test, P = 0.134). Multivariate Cox regression analyses identified an AACI score as an independent predictor of overall survival (hazard ratio, 6.870; 95% confidence interval, 2.049-23.031; P = 0.002). The AACI score was a better discriminator of overall survival than the Charlson comorbidity index score.

conclusionsAACI scores may enable more tailored, individualized management strategies for patients with surgically treated non-metastatic ccRCC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Renal CellComorbidityDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHealth Status IndicatorsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNephrectomyPredictive Value of TestsRepublic of KoreaComorbidityNephrectomyPrognosisRenal cell carcinomaSurvival

Identifiers

PMID31606760
PMCPMC11804378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.