Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31606138›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry2020

Evaluating the Impact of Nonrandom Mating: Psychiatric Outcomes Among the Offspring of Pairs Diagnosed With Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder.

Ashley E Nordsletten, Gustaf Brander, Henrik Larsson, Paul Lichtenstein, James J Crowley, Patrick F Sullivan, Naomi R Wray, David Mataix-Cols

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. 15 years of GWAS discovery: Realizing the promise.American journal of human genetics · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ashley E NordslettenDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: ashley.nordsletten@gmail.com.
Gustaf BranderDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Henrik LarssonDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Paul LichtensteinDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
James J CrowleyDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Patrick F SullivanDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Naomi R WrayInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
David Mataix-ColsDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Investigating the molecular mechanisms and consequences of assortative mating in major psychiatric disorders: completing a missing piece of the psychiatric genetics puzzleR21MH112963 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CROWLEY, JAMES JOSEPH · 2017 to 2018
$329k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH112963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonrandom mating has been shown for psychiatric diagnoses, with hypothesized-but not quantified-implications for offspring liability. This national cohort study enumerated the incidence of major psychiatric disorders among the offspring of parent pairs affected with schizophrenia (SCZ) and/or bipolar disorder (BIP) (i.e., dual-affected pairs).

methodsParticipants were all Swedish residents alive or born between 1968 and 2013 (n = 4,255,196 unique pairs and 8,343,951 offspring). Offspring with dual-affected, single-affected, and unaffected parents were followed (1973-2013) for incidence of broad psychiatric disorders. Primary outcomes included hazard ratio (HR) and cumulative incidence for SCZ and BIP in the offspring. Additional outcomes included any neuropsychiatric, anxiety, depressive, personality, or substance use disorders. Cumulative incidences of SCZ and BIP were used to inform heritability models for these disorders.

resultsHazards were highest within disorder (e.g., offspring of dual-SCZ pairs had sharply raised hazards for SCZ [HR = 55.3]); however, they were significantly raised for all diagnoses (HR range = 2.89-11.84). Incidences were significantly higher for the majority of outcomes, with 43.4% to 48.5% diagnosed with "any" disorder over follow-up. Risks were retained, with modest attenuations, for the offspring of heterotypic pairs. The estimated heritability of liability for SCZ (h

conclusionsRisks for a broad spectrum of psychiatric diagnoses are significantly raised in the offspring of dual-affected parents, in line with expectations from a polygenic model of liability to disease risk. How these risks may contribute to population maintenance of these disorders is considered.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderChild of Impaired ParentsSchizophreniaCohort StudiesHumansSwedenBipolar disorderLiabilityMatingOffspringRiskSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID31606138
PMCPMC6984389
OpenAlexW2959357444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.