Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31606051›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Daily stress as link between disadvantage and smoking: an ecological momentary assessment study.

Tina Jahnel, Stuart G Ferguson, Saul Shiffman, Benjamin Schüz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Potential mechanisms linking psychological stress to bone health.International journal of medical sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tina JahnelCollege of Health & Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Stuart G FergusonCollege of Health & Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Saul ShiffmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Benjamin SchüzCollege of Health & Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia. Benjamin.schuez@uni-bremen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0801-498X

Funding

Understanding Emerging Patterns of Non-Daily Smoking: Field and Lab AssessmentsR01DA020742 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SHIFFMAN, SAUL · 2006 to 2010
$2.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020742NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA020742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a well-established social gradient in smoking, but little is known about the underlying behavioral mechanisms. Here, we take a social-ecological perspective by examining daily stress experience as a process linking social disadvantage to smoking behavior.

methodA sample of 194 daily smokers, who were not attempting to quit, recorded their smoking and information about situational and contextual factors for three weeks using an electronic diary. We tested whether socioeconomic disadvantage (indicated by educational attainment, income and race) exerts indirect effects on smoking (cigarettes per day) via daily stress. Stress experience was assessed at the end of each day using Ecological Momentary Assessment methods. Data were analyzed using random effects regression with a lower-level (2-1-1) mediation model.

resultsOn the within-person level lower educated and African American smokers reported significantly more daily stress across the monitoring period, which in turn was associated with more smoking. This resulted in a small significant indirect effect of daily stress experience on social disadvantage and smoking when using education and race as indicator for social disadvantage. No such effects were found when for income as indicator for social disadvantage.

conclusionThese findings highlight the potential for future studies investigating behavioral mechanisms underlying smoking disparities. Such information would aid in the development and improvement of interventions to reduce social inequality in smoking rates and smoking rates in general.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesAdultEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmokingSocioeconomic FactorsStress, PsychologicalDaily stressEMASmokingSocial disadvantage

Identifiers

PMID31606051
PMCPMC6790015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.