Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31606035›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

TetR-family transcription factors in Gram-negative bacteria: conservation, variation and implications for efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance.

A L Colclough, J Scadden, J M A Blair

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Quorum Sensing inMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. ACS chemical biology · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A L ColcloughInstitute of Microbiology and Infection, Biosciences Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
J ScaddenInstitute of Microbiology and Infection, Biosciences Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
J M A BlairInstitute of Microbiology and Infection, Biosciences Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. J.m.a.blair@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6904-4253
University of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (GB) BB/M02623X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTetR-family transcriptional regulators (TFTRs) are DNA binding factors that regulate gene expression in bacteria. Well-studied TFTRs, such as AcrR, which regulates efflux pump expression, are usually encoded alongside target operons. Recently, it has emerged that there are many TFTRs which act as global multi-target regulators. Our classical view of TFTRs as simple, single-target regulators therefore needs to be reconsidered. As some TFTRs regulate essential processes (e.g. metabolism) or processes which are important determinants of resistance and virulence (e.g. biofilm formation and efflux gene expression) and as TFTRs are present throughout pathogenic bacteria, they may be good drug discovery targets for tackling antimicrobial resistant infections. However, the prevalence and conservation of individual TFTR genes in Gram-negative species, has to our knowledge, not yet been studied.

resultsHere, a wide-scale search for TFTRs in available proteomes of clinically relevant pathogens Salmonella and Escherichia species was performed and these regulators further characterised. The majority of identified TFTRs are involved in efflux regulation in both Escherichia and Salmonella. The percentage variance in TFTR genes of these genera was found to be higher in those regulating genes involved in efflux, bleach survival or biofilm formation than those regulating more constrained processes. Some TFTRs were found to be present in all strains and species of these two genera, whereas others (i.e. TetR) are only present in some strains and some (i.e. RamR) are genera-specific. Two further pathogens on the WHO priority pathogen list (K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa) were then searched for the presence of the TFTRs conserved in Escherichia and Salmonella.

conclusionsThrough bioinformatics and literature analyses, we present that TFTRs are a varied and heterogeneous family of proteins required for the regulation of numerous important processes, with consequences to antimicrobial resistance and virulence, and that the roles and responses of these proteins are frequently underestimated.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialBacterial ProteinsComputational BiologyConserved SequenceEscherichia coliGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGram-Negative BacteriaKlebsiella pneumoniaeLikelihood FunctionsMultigene FamilyPhylogenySalmonella typhimuriumTranscription FactorsBacterial ProteinsTranscription FactorsAntimicrobial resistanceConservationRegulationTetR-family

Identifiers

PMID31606035
PMCPMC6790063
OpenAlexW2979951883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.