ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2020
Identification of insulin gene variants in patients with neonatal diabetes in the Chinese population.
Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular and Clinical Profiles of Pediatric Monogenic Diabetes Subtypes: Comprehensive Genetic Analysis of 138 Patients.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
- A Review of the Biosynthesis and Structural Implications of Insulin Gene Mutations Linked to Human Disease.Cells · 2023Review
- Genetic Etiology of Neonatal Diabetes Mellitus in Vietnamese Infants and Characteristics of Those WithFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Monogenic Causes in the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium Cohort: Low Genetic Risk for Autoimmunity in Case Selection.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2021Article
- The KINGSDiabetes · 2020Article
- Genetic Spectrum of Neonatal Diabetes.Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG · 2020Article
- Identification of insulin gene variants in patients with neonatal diabetes in the Chinese population.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
AIMS/
introductionNeonatal diabetes mellitus is created by alterations in the genes responsible for beta-cell mass and/or function. The present study aimed to evaluate the genetic variants in the insulin gene (INS) in four Chinese infants aged <12 months with diabetes onset, and to explore the clinical and genetic characteristics of permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus caused by INS mutations. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe complete coding sequences of KCNJ11, ABCC8 and INS were detected using Sanger sequencing. The pathogenicity of the mutations was determined based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, and the structure of wild-type and mutant proteins was predicted using the web-based tool, Phyre2.
resultsOne novel mutation (p.I99_C100insSI) and three previously reported variants (p.G32S, p.R89C and p.C96R) in INS were identified in four infants with early-onset diabetes. All the mutations in the four patients were de novo. Except for mutation R89C, which causes permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus through the addition of an additional cysteine residue at the cleavage site of the A chain and C-peptide, the other three mutations affected disulfide bonds. The patients had diabetes with marked hyperglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis, and were then treated with exogenous insulin. Mutations in crucial regions of the INS might give rise to diabetes with varying severity.
conclusionsThis study enriches our awareness of the mutant spectrum in INS, and suggests the important role of INS in the development of permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.