Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31605643›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2019

Novel acoustic coupling bath using magnetite nanoparticles for MR-guided transcranial focused ultrasound surgery.

Steven P Allen, Tom Steeves, Austin Fergusson, Dave Moore, Richey M Davis, Eli Vlaisialjevich, Craig H Meyer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of transducer position on BMedical physics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Steven P AllenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Tom SteevesDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Austin FergussonGraduate Program in Translational Biology, Medicine, and Health, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Dave MooreThe Focused Ultrasound Foundation, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Richey M DavisDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Eli VlaisialjevichGraduate Program in Translational Biology, Medicine, and Health, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Craig H MeyerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Virginia Tech · USUniversity of Virginia · USFocused Ultrasound Foundation · US

Funding

The integrated Translational Health Research Institute of Virginia (iTHRIV): Using Data to Improve HealthUL1TR003015 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BROWN, DONALD E, JOHNSTON, KAREN C. · 2019 to 2023
$20.3M
BASIC CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH TRAINING GRANTT32HL007284 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Brant E Isakson, Gary K Owens · 1985 to 2026
$19.6M
Comprehensive MRI Guidance of Focused Ultrasound NeurosurgeryR01EB028773 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI MEYER, CRAIG H · 2020 to 2023
$2.1M
Motion-Robust Methods for Rapid Pediatric MRI without SedationR21EB022309 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI MEYER, CRAIG H · 2016 to 2018
$539k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003015NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR003015NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007284NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028773NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB022309NIH HHSThe Ivy FoundationVirginia Tech
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAcoustic coupling baths, nominally composed of degassed water, play important roles during transcranial focused ultrasound surgery. However, this large water bolus also degrades the quality of intraoperative magnetic resonance (MR) guidance imaging. In this study, we test the feasibility of using dilute, aqueous magnetite nanoparticle suspensions to suppress these image degradations while preserving acoustic compatibility. We examine the effects of these suspensions on metrics of image quality and acoustic compatibility for two types of transcranial focused ultrasound insonation regimes: low-duty cycle histotripsy procedures and high-duty cycle thermal ablation procedures.

methodsMagnetic resonance guidance imaging was used to monitor thermal ablations of in vitro gel targets using a coupling bath composed of various concentrations of aqueous, suspended, magnetite nanoparticles in a clinical transcranial transducer under stationary and flowing conditions. Thermal deposition was monitored using MR thermometry simultaneous to insonation. Then, using normal degassed water as a coupling bath, various concentrations of aqueous, suspended, magnetite nanoparticles were placed at the center of this same transducer and insonated using high-duty cycle pulsing parameters. Passive cavitation detectors recorded cavitation emissions, which were then used to estimate the relative number of cavitation events per insonation (cavitation duty cycle) and the cavitation dose estimates of each nanoparticle concentration. Finally, the nanoparticle mixtures were exposed to low-duty cycle, histotripsy pulses. Passive cavitation detectors monitored cavitation emissions, which were used to estimate cavitation threshold pressures.

resultsThe nanoparticles reduced the MR signal of the coupling bath by 90% in T2- and T2*-weighted images and also removed almost all imaging artifacts caused by coupling bath motion. The coupling baths caused <5% changes in peak temperature change achieved during sonication, as observed via MR thermometry. At low duty cycle insonations, the nanoparticles decreased the cavitation threshold pressure by about 15 ± 7% in a manner uncorrelated with nanoparticle concentration. At high duty cycle insonations, the 0.5 cavitation duty cycle acoustic power threshold varied linearly with nanoparticle concentration.

conclusionsDilute aqueous magnetite nanoparticle suspensions effectively reduced MR imaging artifacts caused by the acoustic coupling bath. They also attenuated acoustic power deposition by <5%. For low duty cycle insonation regimes, the nanoparticles decreased the cavitation threshold by 15 ± 7%. However, for high-duty cycle regimes, the nanoparticles decreased the threshold for cavitation in proportion to nanoparticle concentration.

Indexed as

AcousticsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetite NanoparticlesFeasibility StudiesHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationSurgery, Computer-AssistedMagnetite Nanoparticlescavitationfocused ultrasoundHIFUiron oxidemagnetiteMRI

Identifiers

PMID31605643
PMCPMC6899167
OpenAlexW2979355405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.