Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31605462›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2019

Organ sparing of linac-based targeted marrow irradiation over total body irradiation.

Gregory R Warrell, Valdir C Colussi, Wayne L Swanson, Paolo F Caimi, David B Mansur, Marcos J G de Lima, Gisele C Pereira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory R WarrellFranciscan Health Cancer Center Munster, Munster, IN, USA.
Valdir C ColussiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Wayne L SwansonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Paolo F CaimiDepartment of Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA.
David B MansurDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Marcos J G de LimaDepartment of Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Gisele C PereiraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, USA.
University Hospitals of Cleveland · USFranciscan Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTargeted marrow irradiation (TMI) is an alternative conditioning regimen to total body irradiation (TBI) before bone marrow transplantation in hematologic malignancies. Intensity-modulation methods of external beam radiation therapy are intended to permit significant organ sparing while maintaining adequate target coverage, improving the therapeutic ratio. This study directly compares the dose distributions to targets and organs at risk from TMI and TBI, both modalities conducted by general-use medical linacs at our institution.

methodsTMI treatments were planned for 10 patients using multi-isocentric feathered volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) plans, delivered by 6 MV photon beams of Elekta Synergy linacs. The computed tomography (CT) datasets used to obtain these plans were also used to generate dose distributions of TBI treatments given in the AP/PA extended-field method. We compared dose distributions normalized to the same prescription for both plan types. The generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) of Niemierko for organs and target volumes was used to quantify effective whole structure dose and dose savings.

resultsFor the clinical target volume (CTV), no significant differences were found in mean dose or gEUD, although the radical dose homogeneity index (minimum dose divided by maximum dose) was 31.7% lower (P = 0.002) and the standard deviation of dose was 28.0% greater (P = 0.027) in the TMI plans than in the TBI plans. For the TMI plans, gEUD to the lungs, brain, kidneys, and liver was significantly lower (P < 0.001) by 47.8%, 33.3%, 55.4%, and 51.0%, respectively.

conclusionTMI is capable of maintaining CTV coverage as compared to that achieved in TBI, while significantly sparing organs at risk. Improvement on sparing organs at risk permits a higher prescribed dose to the target or the maximum number of times marrow conditioning may be delivered to a patient while maintaining similar typical tissue complication rates.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBone MarrowFemaleHematologic NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskOrgan Sparing TreatmentsParticle AcceleratorsPrognosisRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRetrospective Studiesequivalent uniform dosegEUDtargeted marrow irradiationTBITMItotal body irradiation

Identifiers

PMID31605462
PMCPMC6839384
OpenAlexW2980217969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.