ReviewJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2020
Low-cost and portable MRI.
Review in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
115 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 251 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic potential of near-infrared spectroscopy in mild cognitive impairment and neurodegenerative disorders: Implications for resource-limited settings.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Pooled it
- How is 3D modeling in metabolic surgery utilized and what is its clinical benefit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Functional MRI Applications for Psychiatric Disease Subtyping.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Pooled it
- Canine brain imaging with a new low-field portable (0.05 T) MRI scanner: a pilotThe veterinary quarterly · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a 0.05 T low-field MRI system for canine brain imaging via comparison with images acquired at 1.5 T field strength: a pilot cadaver study.The veterinary quarterly · 2026Article
- Helium-free MRI systems: What does that mean for a radiology decision maker?Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Helium Supply-Chain Vulnerability of MRI Services: A Global Ecological Analysis of Imaging Capacity and Health-System Resilience.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Time-Conditioned Zero-Shot Self-Supervised Reconstruction for Accelerated 3D Ultra-Low-Field MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography on Personalized Surgical Decision-Making in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Multicentre Pilot Observational Cohort Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- An evaluation of brain volume and cortical thickness measurement at 0.55 T.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Qualitative and quantitative hard-tissue MRI with portable Halbach scanners.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- miniMORPH: A Morphometry Pipeline for Low-Field MRI in Infants.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- In Vivo Imaging With a Low-Cost MRI Scanner and Cloud Data Processing in Low-Resource Settings.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Open-Source Multinuclear Low-Field Preclinical MRI Scanner.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Designing BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- A Low-Cost and Compact High-Frequency Gallium Nitride Gradient Power Amplifier for Low-Field MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Ultra-low fieldCommunications chemistry · 2026Article
- A scoping review of portable ultra-low-field MRI studies in patients with acquired brain injury: Past, present, and future.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Review
- Portable Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging in People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- First-Order Spatial Encoding Simulations for Improved Accuracy in the Presence of Strong BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Research in MRI technology has traditionally expanded diagnostic benefit by developing acquisition techniques and instrumentation to enable MRI scanners to "see more." This typically focuses on improving MRI's sensitivity and spatiotemporal resolution, or expanding its range of biological contrasts and targets. In complement to the clear benefits achieved in this direction, extending the reach of MRI by reducing its cost, siting, and operational burdens also directly benefits healthcare by increasing the number of patients with access to MRI examinations and tilting its cost-benefit equation to allow more frequent and varied use. The introduction of low-cost, and/or truly portable scanners, could also enable new point-of-care and monitoring applications not feasible for today's scanners in centralized settings. While cost and accessibility have always been considered, we have seen tremendous advances in the speed and spatial-temporal capabilities of general-purpose MRI scanners and quantum leaps in patient comfort (such as magnet length and bore diameter), but only modest success in the reduction of cost and siting constraints. The introduction of specialty scanners (eg, extremity, brain-only, or breast-only scanners) have not been commercially successful enough to tilt the balance away from the prevailing model: a general-purpose scanner in a centralized healthcare location. Portable MRI scanners equivalent to their counterparts in ultrasound or even computed tomography have not emerged and MR monitoring devices exist only in research laboratories. Nonetheless, recent advances in hardware and computational technology as well as burgeoning markets for MRI in the developing world has created a resurgence of interest in the topic of low-cost and accessible MRI. This review examines the technical forces and trade-offs that might facilitate a large step forward in the push to "jail-break" MRI from its centralized location in healthcare and allow it to reach larger patient populations and achieve new uses. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy Stage: 6 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:686-696.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.