Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31605431›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc2020

The efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy among patients undergoing coronary angiography or intervention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Biming Zhan, Bo Zhu, Jianxin Hu, Qianghui Huang, Huihui Bao, Xiao Huang, Xiaoshu Cheng

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy among patients undergoing coronary angiography or intervention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Biming ZhanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0136-4773
Bo ZhuDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Jianxin HuDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Qianghui HuangDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Huihui BaoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xiao HuangDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xiaoshu ChengDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Nanchang University · CN

Funding

Key Technology R&D Program of Jiangxi Province Department of Science and Technology 20142BBG70066National Natural Science Foundation of China 81460071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous trials have investigated the effect of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients receiving contrast medium (CM). This meta analysis aims to validate the role of RIC in preventing CIN.

methodsWe searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before April 27, 2019. Two investigators independently extracted basic characteristics from each study. Odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to examine the treatment effect.

resultsA total of 18 studies comprising 2,503 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with conventional therapy, RIC significantly reduced the risk of CIN (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.56, p < .05). Subgroup analyses showed that the protective effect of RIC was stronger in the low-osmolar contrast media group (OR = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.45, p < .05) and the nondiabetic group (OR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.53 p < .05). RIC also significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular events within the first 6 months (OR = 0.39; p < .05), but the influence was not present after long-term follow-up.

conclusionsOur meta-analysis showed that RIC could effectively reduce CIN risk and decrease the short-term incidence of relevant adverse events. Furthermore, the effects of CIN are more pronounced in nondiabetic patients and with the use of low-osmolar contrast medium. This meta-analysis of small trials suggests a possible protective effect of RIC on contrast-induced nephropathy and favors the performance of a large randomized trial to further investigate this strategy.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyAcute Kidney InjuryBiomarkersContrast MediaHumansIschemic PreconditioningRisk FactorsBiomarkersContrast Mediacontrast-induced nephropathycontrast mediumdiabetes mellitusremote ischemic conditioning

Identifiers

PMID31605431
PMCPMC7358796
OpenAlexW2979312246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.