Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31605327›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of surgical oncology2019

Comparative Age-Based Prospective Multi-Institutional Observations of 12,367 Patients Enrolled to the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z901101 Trials (Alliance).

Waddah B Al-Refaie, Paul A Decker, Karla V Ballman, Peter W T Pisters, Mitchell C Posner, Kelly K Hunt, Bryan Meyers, Armin D Weinberg, Heidi Nelson, Lisa Newman and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Waddah B Al-RefaieMedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C., USA.
Paul A DeckerAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Karla V BallmanWeill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Peter W T PistersM.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Mitchell C PosnerUniversity of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kelly K HuntM.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Bryan MeyersWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Armin D WeinbergBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Heidi NelsonAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Lisa NewmanM.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Angelina TanAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jennifer G Le-RademacherAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Arti HurriaCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Aminah JatoiAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Jatoi.aminah@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1081-189X

Funding

Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Collaborations and NCORP Collective ManagementUG1CA189823 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Evanthia Galanis, Olwen Hahn · 2014 to 2026
$120.6M
Statistics CoreU10CA180882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sumithra Jay Mandrekar · 2014 to 2026
$115.0M
Transgenic Mouse FacilityP30CA033572 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STANLEY R. HAMILTON · 1985 to 2026
$86.3M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY / SITEMAN CANCER CENTER LEAD ACADEMIC SITEUG1CA233339 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI NANCY L BARTLETT, Clifford Grant Robinson · 2019 to 2026
$11.3M
Washington University/ Siteman Cancer Center Lead Academic SiteU10CA180833 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARTLETT, NANCY L, KOZOWER, BENJAMIN D · 2014 to 2018
$7.6M
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAP)U10CA180858 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HUNT, KELLY K, PINNIX, CHELSEA CAMILLE · 2014 to 2018
$5.6M
NCI National Clinical Trials Network-Network Lead Academic Participating SitesU10CA180836 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CHMURA, STEVEN J, KINDLER, HEDY L · 2014 to 2018
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA033572NCI NIH HHS P30CA033572NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180833NCI NIH HHS U10CA180833NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180836NCI NIH HHS U10CA180836NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180858NCI NIH HHS U10CA180858NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180882NCI NIH HHS U10CA180882NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189823NCI NIH HHS UG1CA189823NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe risk of surgery, particularly for older cancer patients with serious, extensive comorbidities, can make this otherwise curative modality precarious. Leveraging data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group, this study sought to characterize age-based comparative demographics, adverse event rates, and study completion rates to define how best to conduct research in older cancer patients.

methodsThis study relied on clinical data from 21 completed studies to assess whether older patients experienced more grade 3 or worse adverse events and were more likely to discontinue study participation prematurely than their younger counterparts.

resultsThe study enrolled 12,367 patients. The median age was 60 years, and 36% of the patients were 65 years of age or older. Among 4008 patients with adverse event data, 1067 (27%) had experienced a grade 3 or worse event. The patients 65 years or older had higher rates of grade 3 or worse adverse events compared to younger patients [32% vs. 24%; odds ratio (OR), 1.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3-1.7; p < 0.0001]. This association was not observed in multivariate analyses. The study protocol was completed by 97% of the patients. No association was observed between age and trial completion (OR 0.8; 95% CI 0.7-1.1; p = 0.14). Only the older gastrointestinal cancer trial patients were less likely to complete their studies compared to younger patients (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.30-0.70; p < 0.0001).

conclusionDespite higher rates of adverse events, the older patients typically completed the study protocol, thereby contributing relevant data on how best to render care to older cancer patients and affirming the important role of enrolling these patients to surgical trials.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicAgedAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPrognosisProspective StudiesSocieties, MedicalSurgeonsSurgical Procedures, OperativeSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID31605327
PMCPMC6868343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.