Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31605279›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2020

Sedation During Endoscopy in Patients with Cirrhosis: Safety and Predictors of Adverse Events.

Jerome Edelson, Alejandro L Suarez, Jingwen Zhang, Don C Rockey

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The clinical relevance of acute-on-chronic liver failure in medical procedures: Endoscopy, interventions and surgery.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Safety of Endoscopy in Cirrhosis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Endo-anesthesia: a primer.Gastroenterology report · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. PropofolWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jerome EdelsonDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Suite 803, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Alejandro L SuarezDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Suite 803, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Jingwen ZhangDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Don C RockeyDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Suite 803, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. rockey@musc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3751-2961
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSedation during endoscopy in cirrhotic patients is typically via moderate sedation, most commonly using a combination of a benzodiazepine (i.e., midazolam) and narcotic (i.e., fentanyl) or with propofol using monitored anesthesia care (MAC). Here, we examined the safety of moderate sedation and MAC in patients with cirrhosis.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study of cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopy from a large academic medical center between 2010 and 2014 examined extensive clinical data including the following: past history, physical findings, laboratory results, and procedural adverse events. Adverse events were defined a priori and included hypoxia, hypotension, bleeding, and death.

resultsWe identified 2618 patients with cirrhosis who underwent endoscopic procedures; the mean age was 56 years, 36% were female, the mean Child-Pugh score was 9.3 (IQR: 8, 11), and Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 3.2 (IQR: 1, 4); 1157 had MAC; and 1461 had moderate sedation. There was no difference in the frequency of adverse events in MAC and moderate sedation groups, with a total of 15 adverse events (7/1157 MAC and 8/1461 moderate sedation). The most common procedure performed was esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD, n = 1667) and was associated with 10 adverse events. Overall, adverse events included bradycardia (1), hypoxia (7), bleeding (5), laryngospasm (1), and perforation (1). The frequency was similar for EGD, ERCP, and colonoscopy-each at a rate of 0.6%.

conclusionsAdverse events in cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopy appeared to be similar with moderate sedation or MAC, and the frequency was the same for different types of procedures.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, AnesthesiaAgedAnalgesics, OpioidCohort StudiesEndoscopyFemaleFentanylForecastingHumansLiver CirrhosisMaleMidazolamMiddle AgedProcedural SedationRetrospective StudiesAdjuvants, AnesthesiaAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylMidazolamAdverse eventsColonoscopyEsophagogastroduodenoscopyModerate sedationMonitored anesthesia care

Identifiers

PMID31605279
OpenAlexW2979409800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.