Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31605214›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for a sigmoid type of achalasia: short-term outcomes and changes in the esophageal angle.

Shota Maruyama, Yusuke Taniyama, Tadashi Sakurai, Makoto Hikage, Chiaki Sato, Kai Takaya, Takuro Konno, Takeshi Naitoh, Michiaki Unno, Takashi Kamei

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Modern Age of POEM: the Past, Present and Future of Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Review
  10. Outcomes of Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy in Sigmoid and Advanced Sigmoid Achalasia.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  11. Quantification of Esophageal Angulation in Sigmoid Achalasia: Are We There Yet?Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shota MaruyamaDepartment of Surgery, Hachinohe City Hospital, 3-1-1 Tamukai, Hachinohe, Aomori, 031-8555, Japan. a0mb1086-thk@umin.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-8067-4333
Yusuke TaniyamaDepartment of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.
Tadashi SakuraiDepartment of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.
Makoto HikageDepartment of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.
Chiaki SatoDepartment of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.
Kai TakayaDepartment of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.
Takuro KonnoDepartment of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.
Takeshi NaitohDepartment of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.
Michiaki UnnoDepartment of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.
Takashi KameiDepartment of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPer-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an endoscopic procedure whereby the esophageal muscle is incised in order to lower the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure. Since the time it was first performed in 2008 and subsequently reported on in 2010 by Inoue et al., POEM has been shown to be safe and effective for straight type of achalasia. On the other hand, the efficacy of POEM had been controversial for patients with achalasia of the sigmoid type, in which a high LES pressure is accompanied by morphological changes, including dilation, acute angulation, and rotation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of POEM in patients with sigmoid type of achalasia.

methodsBetween May 2015 and December 2017, 16 patients with a sigmoid type of achalasia underwent POEM in our institute. The POEM procedure was the same as that for the straight type of achalasia. The double-scope technique was used to check the distal end of the submucosal tunnel from the gastric side. The primary endpoint was improvement of Eckardt score at 2 months after POEM. The secondary endpoints comprised operating time, change in the esophageal angulation, and adverse events.

resultsAll patients underwent POEM without severe adverse events. The respective parameters before and after POEM significantly differed in terms of mean (SD) Eckardt score [4.9 (2.0) vs. 0.4 (0.6), p < 0.01], LES pressure [19.4 (10.2) vs. 9.2 (6.4), p < 0.01], and integrated relaxation pressure [17.6 (9.2) vs. 7.9 (5.5), p < 0.01]. The average operation time was 94.7 ± 31.4 min. The average esophageal angulation was 88.4° ± 23.1° before POEM and 109.5° ± 16.7° after POEM (p < 0.01). Four patients had postoperative complications that were treated conservatively.

conclusionsPOEM can improve both LES pressure and esophageal angulation in patients with sigmoid achalasia.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedEsophageal AchalasiaEsophageal Sphincter, LowerEsophagusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyotomyNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsPressureEndoscopyPer-oral endoscopic myotomySigmoid type of achalasia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.