ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020
Improving attainment of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a nationwide video-based benchmark of resident-performed cases.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- TempoSafe-CVS: A Temporal Multi-scale Deep Learning Framework for Automated Assessment of the Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- How to achieve the critical view of safety for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Technical aspects.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2023Article
- Major iatrogenic bile duct injury during elective cholecystectomy: a Czech population register-based study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Textbook Outcome as a Composite Quality Measure of Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Use of the self-reported critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy during residency.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective investigation from both cognitive and executive aspects.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Application of Intelligent Detection of Neural Signal in Depth Evaluation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Anesthesia.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Are YouTube Videos a Reliable Training Method for Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy? A Simulated Decision-Making Exercise to Assess the Critical View of Safety.Surgery journal (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe hypothesized that practicing surgeons would successfully achieve a better and more frequent Critical View of Safety (CVS) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after participation in a structured Safe CVS Curriculum.
methodsAll surgeons performing LC at a regional health system had four LC cases recorded: twice before and twice after a curriculum focused on the CVS, which was led by a member of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Safe LC Task Force. Videos were then de-identified and randomly ordered for grading on a 6-point CVS assessment tool by two expert surgeons, who were blinded to the operator and whether the surgeries were performed before or after the curriculum. Confidence surveys and performance on a CVS identification video quiz were also compared pre- and post-curriculum.
resultsTwelve surgeons (five general, four acute care, and three minimally invasive) with an average experience of 17.9 ± 6.3 years participated in the study. After the curriculum, surgeons achieved all three CVS criteria in more cases (1/24 (4%) versus 10/24 (42%), p < 0.004). There was also significant improvement in correctly identifying whether the CVS was achieved in 10 video clips from the Internet (7.9 ± 1.5 vs. 9.3 ± 0.8, p = 0.006) and increased confidence on a 5-point Likert scale in accurately identifying the CVS (4.5 ± 0.5 vs. 4.9 ± 0.3, p = 0.017).
conclusionA structured curriculum on achieving a quality CVS for practicing, experienced surgeons improved their confidence and frequency of obtaining the Critical View of Safety during LC. We recommend that the Safe CVS Curriculum be considered for widespread use in order to increase the quality and frequency of attaining the Critical View of Safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31605213What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.