Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31605213›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Improving attainment of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Tetsuya Nakazato, Bailey Su, Stephanie Novak, Shanley B Deal, Kristine Kuchta, Michael Ujiki

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tetsuya NakazatoDepartment of Surgery, Grainger Center of Simulation and Innovation, NorthShore University HealthSystem, 2650 Ridge Ave, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.
Bailey SuDepartment of Surgery, Grainger Center of Simulation and Innovation, NorthShore University HealthSystem, 2650 Ridge Ave, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.
Stephanie NovakDepartment of Surgery, Grainger Center of Simulation and Innovation, NorthShore University HealthSystem, 2650 Ridge Ave, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.
Shanley B DealDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kristine KuchtaDepartment of Surgery, Grainger Center of Simulation and Innovation, NorthShore University HealthSystem, 2650 Ridge Ave, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.
Michael UjikiDepartment of Surgery, Grainger Center of Simulation and Innovation, NorthShore University HealthSystem, 2650 Ridge Ave, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA. mujiki@northshore.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe hypothesized that practicing surgeons would successfully achieve a better and more frequent Critical View of Safety (CVS) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after participation in a structured Safe CVS Curriculum.

methodsAll surgeons performing LC at a regional health system had four LC cases recorded: twice before and twice after a curriculum focused on the CVS, which was led by a member of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Safe LC Task Force. Videos were then de-identified and randomly ordered for grading on a 6-point CVS assessment tool by two expert surgeons, who were blinded to the operator and whether the surgeries were performed before or after the curriculum. Confidence surveys and performance on a CVS identification video quiz were also compared pre- and post-curriculum.

resultsTwelve surgeons (five general, four acute care, and three minimally invasive) with an average experience of 17.9 ± 6.3 years participated in the study. After the curriculum, surgeons achieved all three CVS criteria in more cases (1/24 (4%) versus 10/24 (42%), p < 0.004). There was also significant improvement in correctly identifying whether the CVS was achieved in 10 video clips from the Internet (7.9 ± 1.5 vs. 9.3 ± 0.8, p = 0.006) and increased confidence on a 5-point Likert scale in accurately identifying the CVS (4.5 ± 0.5 vs. 4.9 ± 0.3, p = 0.017).

conclusionA structured curriculum on achieving a quality CVS for practicing, experienced surgeons improved their confidence and frequency of obtaining the Critical View of Safety during LC. We recommend that the Safe CVS Curriculum be considered for widespread use in order to increase the quality and frequency of attaining the Critical View of Safety.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, Medical, ContinuingBile DuctsCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicClinical CompetenceFemaleGeneral SurgeryHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsQuality ImprovementSurveys and QuestionnairesVideo RecordingBile duct injuryCritical view of safetyLaparoscopic cholecystectomyStructured curriculumSurgical education

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.