Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31605182›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2020

O

Brianna K Smith, Ross H Roberts, Frank A Frizelle

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Letter to the Editor: OWorld journal of surgery · 2020
    Article
  9. Authors' Reply: OWorld journal of surgery · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brianna K SmithChristchurch Public Hospital, Canterbury District Health Board, 2 Riccarton Ave, Christchurch Central, Christchurch, 8011, New Zealand. brianna.kate2@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4893-6268
Ross H RobertsDepartment of General Surgery at Christchurch Public Hospital, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Frank A FrizelleDepartment of General Surgery at Christchurch Public Hospital, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Canterbury District Health Board · NZChristchurch Hospital · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the effects of perioperative high (80%) versus low (30%) fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO

backgroundThe routine use of high fraction perioperative oxygen in patients is "standard of care" and recommended by the World Health Organisation; however, whether there is truly any benefit to this therapy has been challenged by some authors. Questions have also been raised about the possibility of harm from oxygen therapy.

methodRandomised control trials comparing high-to-low FiO

resultsTwelve studies involving 10,212 participants were included. At 15 days postoperatively, and at the longest point of post-operative follow-up, there was no statistically significant reduction in the risk of SSI when comparing patients who received a perioperative FiO

conclusionThis meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference in post-operative SSI or mortality when comparing patients receiving an FiO

Indexed as

HumansOxygenPerioperative PeriodSurgical Wound InfectionOxygen

Identifiers

PMID31605182
OpenAlexW2980214883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.