Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31605171›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2020

Prognostic Assessment of Non-functioning Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Neoplasms as a Basis for Risk-Adapted Resection Strategies.

F M Watzka, F Meyer, J I Staubitz, C Fottner, A Schad, H Lang, T J Musholt

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

F M WatzkaEndocrine Surgery, Clinic of General, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
F MeyerEndocrine Surgery, Clinic of General, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
J I StaubitzEndocrine Surgery, Clinic of General, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
C FottnerEndocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, University Medical Center University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
A SchadInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
H LangInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
T J MusholtEndocrine Surgery, Clinic of General, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. musholt@uni-mainz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn contrast to exocrine pancreatic carcinomas, prognosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNEN) are significantly different. The variable growth pattern and associated clinical situation of functioning and non-functioning PNEN demand an individualized surgical approach. However, due to the scarce evidence associated with the rare disease, guidelines lack detailed recommendations for indication and for the required extent of surgical resection.

methodsIn a retrospective single-center study from 1990 to 2018, 239 patients with PNEN were identified. Clinical data were collected in the MaDoc database of the University Medical Center Mainz. A total of 155 non-functional PNEN were selected for further analysis.

resultsAccording to the classification of NET by the WHO in 2017, 28.8% (n = 40) of the tumors were G1, 61.9% (n = 86) G2, and 9.4% (n = 13) G3. In 73 patients, hepatic metastases were present. Sixty patients had lymph node metastasis. An R0 resection was achieved in 98 cases, an R1 situation in 10 cases. Five times, a tumor debulking was carried out (R2) and 5 times the operation was aborted without any resection because of the advanced tumor stage. A relapse occurred in 29 patients. Different prognostic factors (grade, tumor size, age) were analyzed. Grade-dependent 10-year overall survival rates were 79.5% (grade 1) and 60.1% (grade 2), respectively. The survival rate of grade 3 patients was limited to 66.7% after 13 months.

conclusionIn our study, patients with non-functioning PNEN had a longer overall survival after successful R0 resection. The risk analysis confirmed a Ki-67 cutoff value of 5%, which divided a high- and low-risk group. Patients with a PNEC G3 (Ki-67 index > 50%) had a very poor prognosis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.