Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31604972›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Carbon and Water Use Efficiencies: A Comparative Analysis of Ten Terrestrial Ecosystem Models under Changing Climate.

Bassil El Masri, Christopher Schwalm, Deborah N Huntzinger, Jiafu Mao, Xiaoying Shi, Changhui Peng, Joshua B Fisher, Atul K Jain, Hanqin Tian, Benjamin Poulter and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effects of Increasing COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ecological Restoration and Carbon Sequestration Regulation of Mining Areas-A Case Study of Huangshi City.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. The Terrestrial Biosphere Model Farm.Journal of advances in modeling earth systems · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Bassil El MasriDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Murray State University, Murray, KY, 42071, USA. belmasri@murraystate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1017-5467
Christopher SchwalmWoods Hole Research Center, Falmouth, MA, 02540, USA.
Deborah N HuntzingerSchool of Earth Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.
Jiafu MaoEnvironmental Sciences Division and Climate Change Science Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, 37831, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2050-7373
Xiaoying ShiEnvironmental Sciences Division and Climate Change Science Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, 37831, TN, USA.
Changhui PengDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Quebec at Montreal, Montréal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2037-8097
Joshua B FisherJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91109, USA.
Atul K JainDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4051-3228
Hanqin TianInternational Center for Climate and Global Change Research, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1806-4091
Benjamin PoulterNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9493-8600
Anna M MichalakDepartment of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6152-7979
Oak Ridge National Laboratory · USAuburn University · USCarnegie Institution for Science · USGoddard Space Flight Center · USJet Propulsion Laboratory · USMurray State University · USNorthern Arizona University · USUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CAUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USWoodwell Climate Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Terrestrial ecosystems carbon and water cycles are tightly coupled through photosynthesis and evapotranspiration processes. The ratios of carbon stored to carbon uptake and water loss to carbon gain are key ecophysiological indicators essential to assess the magnitude and response of the terrestrial plant to the changing climate. Here, we use estimates from 10 terrestrial ecosystem models to quantify the impacts of climate, atmospheric CO

Identifiers

PMID31604972
PMCPMC6789101
OpenAlexW2979377675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.