Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31604959›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

New insights on lake sediment DNA from the catchment: importance of taphonomic and analytical issues on the record quality.

C Giguet-Covex, G F Ficetola, K Walsh, J Poulenard, M Bajard, L Fouinat, P Sabatier, L Gielly, E Messager, A L Develle and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sediment DNA can revolutionize archaeology-if it is used the right way.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Using ancient sedimentary DNA to forecast ecosystem trajectories under climate change.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

C Giguet-CovexBioArch-Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK. charline.giguet-covex@univ-smb.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5141-4815
G F FicetolaUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA, 38000, Grenoble, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3414-5155
K WalshBioArch-Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1621-2625
J PoulenardEDYTEM, UMR 5204 CNRS, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, Pôle Montagne, 73376, Le Bourget du Lac, France.
M BajardEDYTEM, UMR 5204 CNRS, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, Pôle Montagne, 73376, Le Bourget du Lac, France.
L FouinatEDYTEM, UMR 5204 CNRS, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, Pôle Montagne, 73376, Le Bourget du Lac, France.
P SabatierEDYTEM, UMR 5204 CNRS, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, Pôle Montagne, 73376, Le Bourget du Lac, France.
L GiellyUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA, 38000, Grenoble, France.
E MessagerEDYTEM, UMR 5204 CNRS, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, Pôle Montagne, 73376, Le Bourget du Lac, France.
A L DevelleEDYTEM, UMR 5204 CNRS, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, Pôle Montagne, 73376, Le Bourget du Lac, France.
F DavidCEREGE, UMR CNRS 7330, IRD 161-Marseille Université, Technopôle de l'Arbois Méditerranée, BP 80, 13545, Aix en Provence cedex 4, France.
P TaberletUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA, 38000, Grenoble, France.
E BrissetAix-Marseille Univ, Avignon Univ, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Aix-en-Provence, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8706-0505
F GuiterAix-Marseille Univ, Avignon Univ, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Aix-en-Provence, France.
R SinetAix-Marseille Univ, Avignon Univ, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Aix-en-Provence, France.
F ArnaudEDYTEM, UMR 5204 CNRS, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, Pôle Montagne, 73376, Le Bourget du Lac, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, an increasing number of studies have used lake sediment DNA to trace past landscape changes, agricultural activities or human presence. However, the processes responsible for lake sediment formation and sediment properties might affect DNA records via taphonomic and analytical processes. It is crucial to understand these processes to ensure reliable interpretations for "palaeo" studies. Here, we combined plant and mammal DNA metabarcoding analyses with sedimentological and geochemical analyses from three lake-catchment systems that are characterised by different erosion dynamics. The new insights derived from this approach elucidate and assess issues relating to DNA sources and transfer processes. The sources of eroded materials strongly affect the "catchment-DNA" concentration in the sediments. For instance, erosion of upper organic and organo-mineral soil horizons provides a higher amount of plant DNA in lake sediments than deep horizons, bare soils or glacial flours. Moreover, high erosion rates, along with a well-developed hydrographic network, are proposed as factors positively affecting the representation of the catchment flora. The development of open and agricultural landscapes, which favour the erosion, could thus bias the reconstructed landscape trajectory but help the record of these human activities. Regarding domestic animals, pastoral practices and animal behaviour might affect their DNA record because they control the type of source of DNA ("point" vs. "diffuse").

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringAgricultureDNAGeologic SedimentsHuman ActivitiesHumansLakesPlantsDNA

Identifiers

PMID31604959
PMCPMC6789010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.