Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31604958›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

In vivo engineered extracellular matrix scaffolds with instructive niches for oriented tissue regeneration.

Meifeng Zhu, Wen Li, Xianhao Dong, Xingyu Yuan, Adam C Midgley, Hong Chang, Yuhao Wang, Haoyu Wang, Kai Wang, Peter X Ma and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 142 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed
32.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 302 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Grafts in tendon repair.Materials today. Bio · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Production of plateletsHaematologica · 2025
    Article

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Meifeng ZhuCollege of Life Science, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials (Ministry of Education), State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Xu Rongxiang Regeneration Life Science Center, Nankai University, 300071, Tianjin, China.
Wen LiCollege of Life Science, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials (Ministry of Education), State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Xu Rongxiang Regeneration Life Science Center, Nankai University, 300071, Tianjin, China.
Xianhao DongCollege of Life Science, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials (Ministry of Education), State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Xu Rongxiang Regeneration Life Science Center, Nankai University, 300071, Tianjin, China.
Xingyu YuanCollege of Life Science, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials (Ministry of Education), State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Xu Rongxiang Regeneration Life Science Center, Nankai University, 300071, Tianjin, China.
Adam C MidgleyCollege of Life Science, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials (Ministry of Education), State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Xu Rongxiang Regeneration Life Science Center, Nankai University, 300071, Tianjin, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7622-0275
Hong ChangCollege of Life Science, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials (Ministry of Education), State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Xu Rongxiang Regeneration Life Science Center, Nankai University, 300071, Tianjin, China.
Yuhao WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, 07030, USA.
Haoyu WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, 07030, USA.
Kai WangCollege of Life Science, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials (Ministry of Education), State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Xu Rongxiang Regeneration Life Science Center, Nankai University, 300071, Tianjin, China. wkcs424@163.com.
Peter X MaDepartment of Biologic and Materials Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Macromolecular Science and Engineering Centre, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0191-9487
Hongjun WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, 07030, USA. hongjun.wang@stevens.edu.
Deling KongCollege of Life Science, Key Laboratory of Bioactive Materials (Ministry of Education), State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Xu Rongxiang Regeneration Life Science Center, Nankai University, 300071, Tianjin, China. kongdeling@nankai.edu.cn.
Nankai University · CNStevens Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Micro- and nanofiber enabled biomimetic periosteum for bone repair and reconstructionR01AR067859 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WANG, HONGJUN, ZHANG, XINPING · 2016 to 2020
$2.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR067859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implanted scaffolds with inductive niches can facilitate the recruitment and differentiation of host cells, thereby enhancing endogenous tissue regeneration. Extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds derived from cultured cells or natural tissues exhibit superior biocompatibility and trigger favourable immune responses. However, the lack of hierarchical porous structure fails to provide cells with guidance cues for directional migration and spatial organization, and consequently limit the morpho-functional integration for oriented tissues. Here, we engineer ECM scaffolds with parallel microchannels (ECM-C) by subcutaneous implantation of sacrificial templates, followed by template removal and decellularization. The advantages of such ECM-C scaffolds are evidenced by close regulation of in vitro cell activities, and enhanced cell infiltration and vascularization upon in vivo implantation. We demonstrate the versatility and flexibility of these scaffolds by regenerating vascularized and innervated neo-muscle, vascularized neo-nerve and pulsatile neo-artery with functional integration. This strategy has potential to yield inducible biomaterials with applications across tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell DifferentiationCell Growth ProcessesExtracellular MatrixMaleMuscle, SkeletalMyocytes, Smooth MuscleNeovascularization, PhysiologicNerve RegenerationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRegenerative MedicineSchwann CellsTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID31604958
PMCPMC6789018
OpenAlexW2979944716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.