Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31604953›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Bacterial variability in the mammalian gut captured by a single-cell synthetic oscillator.

David T Riglar, David L Richmond, Laurent Potvin-Trottier, Andrew A Verdegaal, Alexander D Naydich, Somenath Bakshi, Emanuele Leoncini, Lorena G Lyon, Johan Paulsson, Pamela A Silver

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The gut microbiota and its biogeography.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  7. From microbiome composition to functional engineering, one step at a time.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Emergent evolutionary forces in spatial models of luminal growth and their application to the human gut microbiota.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The context matrix: Navigating biological complexity for advanced biodesign.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Plasmid Vectors forACS synthetic biology · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Counting Replication Origins to Measure Growth of Pathogens.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David T RiglarDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5004-4373
David L RichmondImage and Data Analysis Core, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1511-6770
Laurent Potvin-TrottierDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7876-2820
Andrew A VerdegaalDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Alexander D NaydichDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Somenath BakshiDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3864-2546
Emanuele LeonciniDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5387-118X
Lorena G LyonDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Johan PaulssonDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8671-4914
Pamela A SilverDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Pamela_Silver@hms.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7856-4071

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIST32AI007640 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, ANDREW L · 2000 to 2022
$4.3M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007640Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic gene oscillators have the potential to control timed functions and periodic gene expression in engineered cells. Such oscillators have been refined in bacteria in vitro, however, these systems have lacked the robustness and precision necessary for applications in complex in vivo environments, such as the mammalian gut. Here, we demonstrate the implementation of a synthetic oscillator capable of keeping robust time in the mouse gut over periods of days. The oscillations provide a marker of bacterial growth at a single-cell level enabling quantification of bacterial dynamics in response to inflammation and underlying variations in the gut microbiota. Our work directly detects increased bacterial growth heterogeneity during disease and differences between spatial niches in the gut, demonstrating the deployment of a precise engineered genetic oscillator in real-life settings.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBiological ClocksCell DivisionEscherichia coliMiceMicroorganisms, Genetically-ModifiedOptical ImagingSynthetic Biology

Identifiers

PMID31604953
PMCPMC6789134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.