Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31604835›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Domain-Specific Working Memory, But Not Dopamine-Related Genetic Variability, Shapes Reward-Based Motor Learning.

Peter Holland, Olivier Codol, Elizabeth Oxley, Madison Taylor, Elizabeth Hamshere, Shadiq Joseph, Laura Huffer, Joseph M Galea

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Dopamine D2 Receptor Modulates Exercise Related Effect on Cortical Excitation/Inhibition and Motor Skill Acquisition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Implicit reward-based motor learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter HollandSchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom P.J.Holland@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8591-3575
Olivier CodolSchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0796-5457
Elizabeth OxleySchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Madison TaylorSchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth HamshereSchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Shadiq JosephSchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Laura HufferSchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Joseph M GaleaSchool of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0009-4049
University of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The addition of rewarding feedback to motor learning tasks has been shown to increase the retention of learning, spurring interest in its possible utility for rehabilitation. However, motor tasks using rewarding feedback have repeatedly been shown to lead to great interindividual variability in performance. Understanding the causes of such variability is vital for maximizing the potential benefits of reward-based motor learning. Thus, using a large human cohort of both sexes (

Indexed as

RewardAdolescentAdultDopamineFemaleGenetic VariationHumansLearningMaleMemory, Short-TermMovementPhotic StimulationPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePsychomotor PerformanceYoung AdultDopaminegeneticsmotor learningreachingrewardworking memory

Identifiers

PMID31604835
PMCPMC6867814
OpenAlexW2979681860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.