Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31604786›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Perspectives of health professionals towards deprescribing practice in Asian nursing homes: a qualitative interview study.

Chong-Han Kua, Vivienne Sl Mak, Shaun Wen Huey Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Differences in Factors Influencing Deprescribing between Primary Care Providers: Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chong-Han KuaSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University-Malaysia Campus, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia chong.kua@monash.edu.
Vivienne Sl MakCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University-Parkville Campus, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Shaun Wen Huey LeeSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University-Malaysia Campus, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-7361-6576

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the determinants of deprescribing among health professionals in nursing homes, focusing on knowledge, practice and attitude.

designThis was a qualitative study comprising semi-structured face-to-face interviews guided by 10 open-ended questions. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was achieved and no new ideas were formed. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed for themes. To derive themes, we employed directed content analysis of transcript data. Coding was completed using a combination of open, axial and selective coding.

settingFour nursing homes in Singapore.

participantsThe study involved 17 participants (comprising 4 doctors, 4 pharmacists and 9 nurses).

resultsTwo key themes were identified, enablers and challenges. These were enablers and challenges faced by doctors, pharmacists and nurses towards deprescribing. The identified subthemes for enablers of deprescribing were: (1) awareness of medications that are unnecessary or could be targeted for deprescribing; (2) improving quality of life for patients with limited life expectancy; (3) improving communication between doctors, pharmacists and nurses; (4) systematic deprescribing practice and educational tools and (5) acknowledgement of possible benefits of deprescribing. The identified subthemes for challenges of deprescribing were: (1) symptoms not acknowledged as possibly drug-related; (2) lack of knowledge in patient's and family members' preferences; (3) lack of coordination between health professionals in hospitals and nursing homes and (4) limited tools for deprescribing. The development of a local guideline, mentoring nurses, case discussions, better shared decision-making and improving multidisciplinary communication, may help to support the process of deprescribing.

conclusionIn conclusion, this study highlighted that deprescribing in the nursing homes is perceived by health professionals to be challenging and future research could assess how routine case studies, mentoring and better multidisciplinary communication could improve deprescribing knowledge and process in the nursing homes.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDeprescriptionsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNursing HomesHumansInterviews as TopicNursesPharmacistsPhysiciansQualitative ResearchSingaporedeprescribingdoctorinterviewnursenursing homepharmacist

Identifiers

PMID31604786
PMCPMC6797246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.