Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31604754›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2019

Attachment to primary care and team-based primary care: Retrospective cohort study of people who experienced imprisonment in Ontario.

Fiona Kouyoumdjian, Marie Kim, Tara Kiran, Stephanie Cheng, Kinwah Fung, Aaron Orkin, Claire E Kendall, Samantha Green, Flora I Matheson, Lori Kiefer

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Toward a universal definition of provider-patient attachment in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fiona KouyoumdjianAssistant Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ont, Affiliate Scientist at the Centre for Urban Health Solutions at St Michael's Hospital in Toronto, Ont, and Adjunct Scientist at ICES.
Marie KimMedical student in the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Ottawa in Ontario at the time of the study.
Tara KiranAssociate Scientist in the Department of Family and Community Medicine and the Centre for Urban Health Solutions at St Michael's Hospital, Associate Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto, and Adjunct Scientist at ICES.
Stephanie ChengResearch staff member at ICES.
Kinwah FungResearch staff member at ICES.
Aaron OrkinAssistant Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto and in the Dalla Lana School of Public Health.
Claire E KendallClinician Investigator in the C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre in the Bruyère Research Institute, Assistant Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Ottawa, and Adjunct Scientist at ICES.
Samantha GreenFamily physician in the Department of Family Medicine at St Michael's Hospital and Assistant Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto.
Flora I MathesonResearch scientist in the Centre for Urban Health Solutions and the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto, and at ICES.
Lori KieferAdjunct Lecturer in the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto and Senior Medical Consultant at the Ontario Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine attachment to primary care and team-based primary care in the community for people who experienced imprisonment in Ontario, and to compare these attachment data with data for the general population.

designPopulation-based retrospective cohort study.

settingOntario.

participantsAll persons released from provincial prison in Ontario to the community in 2010 who were linked with provincial health administrative data, and an age- and sex-matched general population group.

main outcome measuresPrimary care attachment and team-based primary care attachment in the 2 years before admission to provincial prison (baseline) and in the 2 years after release in 2010 (follow-up) for the prison release group, and for the corresponding periods for the general population group.

resultsPeople in the prison release group (n = 48 861) were less likely to be attached to primary care compared with the age- and sex-matched general population group (n = 195 444), at 58.9% versus 84.1% at baseline (

conclusionPeople who experience imprisonment have lower primary care attachment compared with the general population. Efforts should be made to understand barriers and to facilitate access to high-quality primary care for this population, including through initiatives to link people while in prison with primary care in the community.

Indexed as

Object AttachmentProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersOntarioPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CarePrisonersPrisonsRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31604754
PMCPMC6788664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.