Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31604424›Full record

SynthesisBMC geriatrics2019

A systematic literature review of the assessment of treatment burden experienced by patients and their caregivers.

Orla C Sheehan, Bruce Leff, Christine S Ritchie, Sarah K Garrigues, Lingsheng Li, Debra Saliba, Roya Fathi, Cynthia M Boyd

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Predictors of Older Adult Adherence With Emergency Department Discharge Instructions.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Measuring treatment burden with the treatment burden questionnaire (TBQ): a narrative literature review and implications for geriatric research and clinical practice.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Orla C SheehanCenter on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Suite 2-700, 2024 E. Monument Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205-2223, USA. osheeha1@jhmi.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5078-9519
Bruce LeffDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Center for Transformative Geriatric Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Mason F. Lord Building, Center Tower, 5200 Eastern Avenue, 7th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
Christine S RitchieDivision of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California St, Suite 380, San Francisco, CA, 94143-1265, USA.
Sarah K GarriguesDivision of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California St, Suite 380, San Francisco, CA, 94143-1265, USA.
Lingsheng LiDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Center for Transformative Geriatric Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Mason F. Lord Building, Center Tower, 5200 Eastern Avenue, 7th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
Debra SalibaUCLA/ JH Borun Center and Los Angeles VA GRECC, 10945 Le Conte Avenue, Suite 2339, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Roya FathiDepartment of Adult and Family Medicine, Primary Care at Home, Kaiser Permanente San Rafael, 99 Montecillo Road, San Rafael, CA, 94903, USA.
Cynthia M BoydDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Center for Transformative Geriatric Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Mason F. Lord Building, Center Tower, 5200 Eastern Avenue, 7th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.

Funding

Patient-Centered Care for Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions: Research and Mentoring ProgramK24AG056578 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOYD, CYNTHIA MELINDA · 2017 to 2021
$1.1M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG056578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany older adults with multiple chronic conditions, particularly those who are functionally impaired, spend considerable time juggling the competing demands of managing their conditions often assisted by caregivers. We examined methods of assessing the treatment burden experienced by this population as a first step to identifying strategies to reduce it.

methodsSystematic searches were performed of the peer-reviewed and grey-literature (PubMed, Cochrane library, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, New York Academy of Medicine Grey Literature Review, NLM catalog and ProQuest Digital Theses and Dissertations). After title and abstract screening, both qualitative and quantitative articles describing approaches to assessment of treatment burden were included.

resultsForty-five articles from the peer reviewed and three items from the grey literature were identified. Most articles (34/48) discussed treatment burden associated with a specific condition. All but one examined the treatment burden experienced by patients and six addressed the treatment burden experienced by caregivers. Qualitative studies revealed many aspects of treatment burden including the burdens of understanding the condition, juggling, monitoring and adjusting treatments, efforts to engage with others for support as well as financial and time burdens. Many tools to assess treatment burden in different populations were identified through the qualitative data. The most commonly used instrument was the Treatment Burden Questionnaire.

conclusionsMany instruments are available to assess treatment burden, but no one standardized assessment method was identified. Few articles examined approaches to measuring the treatment burden experienced by caregivers. As people live longer with more chronic conditions healthcare providers need to identify patients and caregivers burdened by treatment and engage in approaches to ameliorate treatment burden. A standard and validated assessment method to measure treatment burden in the clinical setting would help to enhance the care of people with multiple chronic conditions, allow comparison of different approaches to reducing treatment burden, and foster ongoing evaluation and monitoring of burden across conditions, patient populations, and time.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessPatient SatisfactionQualitative ResearchCaregiversChronic DiseaseHealth PersonnelHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeCaregiverMultiple chronic conditionsPatientSystematic reviewTreatment burden

Identifiers

PMID31604424
PMCPMC6788093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.