Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31604302›Full record

ReviewScience (New York, N.Y.)2019

From speech and talkers to the social world: The neural processing of human spoken language.

Sophie K Scott

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Isolating Neural Signatures of Conscious Speech Perception with a No-Report Sine-Wave Speech Paradigm.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Multiple sources of acoustic variation affect speech processing efficiency.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023
    Article
  18. A sound case for listening.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  19. Implicit and explicit learning in talker identification.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophie K ScottInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7510-6297
University College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 090961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human speech perception is a paradigm example of the complexity of human linguistic processing; however, it is also the dominant way of expressing vocal identity and is critically important for social interactions. Here, I review the ways that the speech, the talker, and the social nature of speech interact and how this may be computed in the human brain, using models and approaches from nonhuman primate studies. I explore the extent to which domain-general approaches may be able to account for some of these neural findings. Finally, I address the importance of extending these findings into a better understanding of the social use of speech in conversations.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsLanguageSpeechSpeech PerceptionBrainHumansMotor CortexNeural PathwaysPhoneticsSpeech AcousticsTemporal LobeVoice

Identifiers

PMID31604302
PMCPMC6858272
OpenAlexW2978365189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.