Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31603911›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Seroprevalence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in wild boars (Sus scrofa), hunting dogs, and hunters of Brazil.

Fernanda Pistori Machado, Louise Bach Kmetiuk, Pedro Irineu Teider-Junior, Maysa Pellizzaro, Ana Carolina Yamakawa, Camila Marinelli Martins, Renato van Wilpe Bach, Vívien Midori Morikawa, Ivan Roque de Barros-Filho, Hélio Langoni and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Evolution ofJournal of parasitology research · 2026
    Review
  4. Seroprevalence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  5. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. One Health Approach in Serosurvey ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Article
  10. One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  11. Molecular detection of Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum and Sarcocystis spp in tissues of Sus scrofa slaughtered in southern Brazil.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2023
    Article
  12. Seropositivity of Anti-Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Article
  13. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernanda Pistori MachadoGraduate College of Veterinary Science, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Louise Bach KmetiukGraduate College of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Pedro Irineu Teider-JuniorGraduate College of Veterinary Science, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2839-0720
Maysa PellizzaroPublic Health Institute (PHI), Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Ana Carolina YamakawaDepartment of Veterinary Hygiene and Public Health, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Camila Marinelli MartinsDepartment of Nursing and Public Health, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.
Renato van Wilpe BachDepartment of Medicine, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.
Vívien Midori MorikawaDepartment of Collective Health, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Ivan Roque de Barros-FilhoGraduate College of Veterinary Science, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Hélio LangoniDepartment of Veterinary Hygiene and Public Health, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Andrea Pires Dos SantosDepartment of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1037-970X
Alexander Welker BiondoGraduate College of Veterinary Science, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4182-5821
Universidade Federal do Paraná · BRUniversidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRPurdue University West Lafayette · USUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii has been extensively studied in wild boars worldwide due to the emerging risk for human infection through meat consumption. However, this is the first study that reports toxoplasmosis seroprevalence in wild boars, wild boar hunters and their hunting dogs. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the seroprevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies in the complex wild boars, hunting dogs and hunters, and to determine the risk factors associated with seropositivity in southern and central-western Brazil. Overall, anti-T. gondii seropositivity was observed in 15/71 (21.1%) wild boars by modified agglutination test (MAT); and 49/157 (31.2%) hunting dogs and 15/49 (32.7%) hunters by indirect immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT). Seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in Brazilian wild boars was within the national and international range, posting wild boars as potential environmental sentinels for T. gondii presence. In addition, the findings have comparatively shown that wild boars have been less exposed to infection than hunting dogs or hunters in both Brazilian regions. Seropositivity for T. gondii was statistically higher in 12/14 (85.7%) captured wild boars when compared to 5/57 (7.0%) free-range wild boars (p = 0.000001). Similarly, captured wild boars from anthropized areas were more likely to be seropositive than of natural regions (p = 0.000255). When in multiple regression model, dogs with the habit of wild boar hunting had significant more chance to be positive (adjusted-OR 4.62 CI 95% 1.16-18.42). Despite potential as sentinels of environmental toxoplasmosis, seroprevalence in wild boars alone may provide a biased basis for public health concerns; thus, hunters and hunting dogs should be always be included in such studies. Although hunters should be aware of potential T. gondii infection, wild boars from natural and agricultural areas may present lower protozoa load when compared to wild boars from anthropized areas, likely by the higher presence of domestic cats as definitive hosts.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanBrazilDogsGeographyHumansLogistic ModelsRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic StudiesSwineToxoplasmaAntibodies, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID31603911
PMCPMC6788692
OpenAlexW2979792290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.