Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31603900›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Does task delegation to non-physician health professionals improve quality of diabetes care? Results of a scoping review.

Sanas Mirhoseiny, Tjarko Geelvink, Stephan Martin, Horst Christian Vollmar, Stephanie Stock, Marcus Redaelli

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pathway From Type 2 Diabetes Diagnosis to Action: How to Move People Forward.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. TeDia - A Telemedicine-Based Treatment Model for Inpatient and Interprofessional Diabetes Care.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sanas MirhoseinyInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Tjarko GeelvinkInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Stephan MartinFaculty of Medicine, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Horst Christian VollmarDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Gebäude MAFO 1/61, Bochum, Germany.
Stephanie StockInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Marcus RedaelliInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8830-1999
University Hospital Cologne · DEDeutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. · DERuhr University Bochum · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAs a result of unhealthy lifestyles, reduced numbers of healthcare providers are having to deal with an increasing number of diabetes patients. In light of this shortage of physicians and nursing staff, new concepts of care are needed. The aim of this scoping review is to review the literature and examine the effects of task delegation to non-physician health professionals, with a further emphasis on inter-professional care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsSystematic searches were performed using the PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar databases to retrieve papers published between January 1994 and December 2017. Randomised/non-randomised controlled trials and studies with a before/after design that described the delegation of tasks from physicians to non-physicians in diabetes care were included in the search. This review is a subgroup analysis that further assesses all the studies conducted using a team-based approach.

resultsA total of 45 studies with 12,092 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most of the interventions were performed in an outpatient setting with type-2 diabetes mellitus patients. The non-physician healthcare professionals involved in the team were nurses, pharmacists, community health workers and dietitians. Most studies showed significant improvements in glycaemic control and high patient satisfaction, while there were no indications that the task delegation affected quality of life scores.

conclusionsThe findings of the review suggest that task delegation can provide equivalent glycaemic control and potentially lead to an improvement in the quality of care. However, this review revealed a lack of clinical endpoints, as well as an inconsistency between the biochemical outcome parameters and the patient-centred outcome parameters. Given the vast differences between the individual healthcare systems used around the world, further high-quality research with an emphasis on long-term outcome effects and the expertise of non-physicians is needed.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBlood GlucoseCommunity Health WorkersDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlycated HemoglobinGlycemic IndexHumansMaleMiddle AgedNurse PractitionersNutritionistsPatient SatisfactionPharmacistsPhysicians, Primary CareQuality of Health CareBiomarkersBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, human

Identifiers

PMID31603900
PMCPMC6788697
OpenAlexW2980179860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.